De La Torre Pardo v. AUYANTEPUY INVESTMENTS LLC et al
Florida Southern District Court | |
Judge: | K Michael Moore |
Referred: | Marty Fulgueira Elfenbein |
Case #: | 1:24-cv-22748 |
Nature of Suit | 446 Civil Rights - Amer w/Disabilities - Other |
Cause | 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
Case Filed: | Jul 18, 2024 |
Last checked: Sunday Sep 01, 2024 5:48 AM EDT |
Defendant
AUYANTEPUY INVESTMENTS LLC
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
SANPOCHO RESTAURANT INC.
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Nigel Frank De La Torre Pardo
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 09/06/2024 11:59 PM EDT |
Tuesday, August 13, 2024 | ||
12 | 12
order
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer
Tue 08/13 11:55 AM
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint.11 . Therein, Defendants request a thirty (30) day extension of time to file a response to the Complaint because counsel for Defendants was recently retained and requires additional time to investigate the claims in the dispute. Id. Plaintiff does not oppose the requested relief. Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion11 is GRANTED. Defendants shall respond to the Complaint on or before September 11, 2024. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 8/13/2024. (gbn) |
|
utility
~Util - Set/Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline
Tue 08/13 12:14 PM
Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline: AUYANTEPUY INVESTMENTS LLC response/answer due 9/11/2024; SANPOCHO RESTAURANT INC. response/answer due 9/11/2024. PER DE#12 (cds) |
||
Monday, August 12, 2024 | ||
11 | 11
![]() Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to1 Complaint, by AUYANTEPUY INVESTMENTS LLC, SANPOCHO RESTAURANT INC.. |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
10 | 10
![]() NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Laura Murray Reich on behalf of AUYANTEPUY INVESTMENTS LLC, SANPOCHO RESTAURANT INC.. Attorney Laura Murray Reich added to party AUYANTEPUY INVESTMENTS LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Laura Murray Reich added to party SANPOCHO RESTAURANT INC.(pty:dft). |
|
Thursday, August 01, 2024 | ||
9 | 9
![]() Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Nigel Frank De La Torre Pardo identifying Other Affiliate Pablo Baez, AccessAble, Other Affiliate Barry L. Simons, Other Affiliate Amparo Valencia, Other Affiliate David Montiel for Nigel Frank De La Torre Pardo (Diego, Ramon) |
|
Friday, July 26, 2024 | ||
8 | 8
![]() SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Nigel Frank De La Torre Pardo. AUYANTEPUY INVESTMENTS LLC served on 7/23/2024, response/answer due 8/13/2024. (Virues, Beverly) |
|
Tuesday, July 23, 2024 | ||
7 | 7
![]() SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Nigel Frank De La Torre Pardo. SANPOCHO RESTAURANT INC. served on 7/22/2024, response/answer due 8/12/2024. (Virues, Beverly) |
|
6 | 6
![]() ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Marty Fulgueira Elfenbein on 7/23/2024. See attached document for full details. (nwn) |
|
Monday, July 22, 2024 | ||
5 | 5
order
Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge
Mon 07/22 11:37 AM
PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING PRETRIAL DISCOVERY MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTY FULGUEIRA ELFENBEIN. PURSUANT to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Magistrate Judge Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned Cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Marty Fulgueira Elfenbein to take all necessary and proper action as required by law with respect to any and all pretrial discovery matters. Any motion affecting deadlines set by the Court's Scheduling Order is excluded from this referral, unless specifically referred by separate Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with Magistrate Judge Elfenbein's discovery procedures. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 7/22/2024. (gbn) |
|
4 | 4
order
Pretrial Order
Mon 07/22 11:35 AM
PAPERLESS PRETRIAL ORDER. This order has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff's counsel is hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of a responsive pleading, a copy of this Order. It is further ORDERED that S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1 shall apply to this case and the parties shall hold a scheduling conference no later than twenty (20) days after the filing of the first responsive pleading by the last responding defendant, or within sixty (60) days after the filing of the complaint, whichever occurs first. However, if all defendants have not been served by the expiration of this deadline, Plaintiff shall move for an enlargement of time to hold the scheduling conference, not to exceed 90 days from the filing of the Complaint. Within ten (10) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint scheduling report. Failure of counsel to file a joint scheduling report within the deadlines set forth above may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs. The parties should note that the time period for filing a joint scheduling report is not tolled by the filing of any other pleading, such as an amended complaint or Rule 12 motion. The scheduling conference may be held via telephone. At the conference, the parties shall comply with the following agenda that the Court adopts from S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1: (1) Documents (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.1 and 2) - The parties shall determine the procedure for exchanging a copy of, or a description by category and location of, all documents and other evidence that is reasonably available and that a party expects to offer or may offer if the need arises. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B). (a) Documents include computations of the nature and extent of any category of damages claimed by the disclosing party unless the computations are privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C). (b) Documents include insurance agreements which may be at issue with the satisfaction of the judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(D). (2) List of Witnesses - The parties shall exchange the name, address and telephone number of each individual known to have knowledge of the facts supporting the material allegations of the pleading filed by the party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A). The parties have a continuing obligation to disclose this information. (3) Discussions and Deadlines (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.2) - The parties shall discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case. Failure to comply with this Order or to exchange the information listed above may result in sanctions and/or the exclusion of documents or witnesses at the time of trial. S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.I. The parties are hereby on notice that this Court requires all filings to be formatted in 12 point Times New Roman font and double spaced, including any footnotes, with one inch margins on all sides. Failure to follow these formatting guidelines may result in the filing being stricken, any opposing filing being granted by default, and the imposition of other sanctions, including attorney's fees and costs. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. The parties shall seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing.... Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted). Pursuant to Administrative Order 2016-70 of the Southern District of Florida and consistent with the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit's Local Rules and Internal Operating Procedures, within three (3) days of the conclusion of a trial or other proceeding, parties must file via CM/ECF electronic versions of documentary exhibits admitted into evidence, including photographs of non-documentary physical exhibits. The Parties are directed to comply with each of the requirements set forth in Administrative Order 2016-70 unless directed otherwise by the Court. Telephonic appearances are not permitted for any purpose. Upon reaching a settlement in this matter the parties are instructed to notify the Court by telephone and to file a Notice of Settlement within twenty-four (24) hours. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 7/22/2024. (gbn) |
|
Thursday, July 18, 2024 | ||
3 | 3
![]() Summons Issued as to AUYANTEPUY INVESTMENTS LLC, SANPOCHO RESTAURANT INC.. (nan) |
|
2 | 2
order
Clerk's Notice of Judge Assignment and Optional Consent
Fri 07/19 11:21 AM
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge K. Michael Moore. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Marty Fulgueira Elfenbein is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan) |
|
1 | 1
![]() COMPLAINT against AUYANTEPUY INVESTMENTS LLC, SANPOCHO RESTAURANT INC.. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17689643, filed by Nigel Frank De La Torre Pardo.(Virues, Beverly) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |