Douglas O'Connor, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Original Case: 3:13-cv-03826
| Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals | |
| Case #: | 0:15-cv-17532 |
| Type | civil / private |
| Nature of Suit | 190 Contract - Other Contract |
| Case Filed: | Dec 28, 2015 |
| Terminated: | Sep 25, 2018 |
| Last checked: Thursday Sep 27, 2018 1:33 AM PDT |
|
Amicus Curiae - Pending
NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae - Pending
NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae - Pending
TOWARDS JUSTICE
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae - Pending
ARCHIE OVERTON
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
THOMAS COLOPY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
MATTHEW MANAHAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
ELIE GURFINKEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
|
Represented By
|
GPO
Sep 25 2018
FILED OPINION (RICHARD C. TALLMAN, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and SANDRA S. IKUTA) REVERSED AND REMANDED. , Judge: RRC Authoring. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [11023736] [14-16078, 15-17420, 15-17422, 15-17475, 15-17532, 16-15000, 15-17533, 16-15035, 15-17534, 16-15001, 16-15595] |
| Docket last updated: 09/27/2018 1:31 AM PDT |
| Monday, December 28, 2015 | ||
| 1 | 1
DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: to be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal. Circuit Rule 3-3. Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/04/2016. [9807159] (RT) [Entered: 12/28/2015 03:25 PM]
|
|
| 2 | 2
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: ME): The appeal filed December 28, 2015 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due not later than January 28, 2016; the answering brief is due February 22, 2016 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). The parties are reminded that streamlined requests for extensions of time are not available in preliminary injunction appeals. See http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/content/view.php?pk_id=0000000638. Any request for an extension of time must be requested under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [9807408] (ME) [Entered: 12/28/2015 05:20 PM]
|
|