Original Case: 2:16-cv-04109

Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
Case #: 0:16-cv-56843
Typecivil / private
Nature of Suit820 Property Rights - Copyrights
Case Filed:Dec 15, 2016
Terminated:Aug 24, 2017
Last checked: Monday Aug 28, 2017 1:37 AM PDT
Amicus Curiae
JOHN HOSTETTLER, U.S. Representative
Represented By
William A. Delgado
Willenken Wilson Loh & Delgado, LLP
contact info
Amicus Curiae
SPENCER BACHUS, U.S. Representative
Represented By
William A. Delgado
Willenken Wilson Loh & Delgado, LLP
contact info
Amicus Curiae
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
Represented By
Mitchell Stoltz
Electronic Frontier Foundation
contact info
Amicus Curiae
CLEARPLAY, INC.
Represented By
Mark Sableman
Thompson Coburn LLP
contact info
Amicus Curiae
DVD COPY CONTROL ASSOCIATION, INC.
Represented By
Dean Short
Short Legal Group
contact info
Amicus Curiae
ADVANCED ACCESS CONTENT SYSTEM LICENSE ADMINISTRATOR, LLC
Represented By
Dean Short
Short Legal Group
contact info
Amicus Curiae
COPYRIGHT ALLIANCE
Represented By
Lindsay W. Bowen
Cowan DeBaets Abrahams & Sheppard LLP
contact info
Eleanor M. Lackman
Cowan DeBaets Abrahams & Sheppard LLP
contact info
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant
VIDANGEL, INC.
Represented By
Brendan Maher
Stris & Maher LLP
contact info
Taylor C. Waginere
Blecher Collins Pepperman & Joye, P.C.
contact info
Jaime Wayne Marquart
Baker Marquart LLP
contact info
Dana Erin Berkowitz
Stris & Maher LLP
contact info
Peter K. Stris
Stris & Maher LLP
contact info
Victor O'Connell
Stris & Maher LLP
contact info
Scott M. Malzahn
Baker Marquart LLP
contact info
Daniel Luke Geyser
Stris & Maher LLP
contact info
Maxwell Michael Blecher
Blecher Collins Pepperman & Joye, P.C.
contact info
David W. Quinto
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
contact info
Ryan Geoffrey Baker
Baker Marquart LLP
contact info
Elizabeth Rogers Brannen
Stris & Maher LLP
contact info
Douglas D. Geyser
Stris & Maher LLP
contact info
Donald R. Pepperman
Blecher Collins Pepperman & Joye, P.C.
contact info
Shaun Martin
UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO
contact info
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee
DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC.
Represented By
Kelly M. Klaus
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
contact info
Rose Leda Ehler
Munger Tolles & Olson, LLP
contact info
Donald Beaton Verrilli Jr.
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
contact info
Allyson R. Bennett
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
contact info
Glenn D. Pomerantz
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
contact info
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee
LUCASFILM LTD. LLC
Represented By
Kelly M. Klaus
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
contact info
Rose Leda Ehler
Munger Tolles & Olson, LLP
contact info
Donald Beaton Verrilli Jr.
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
contact info
Allyson R. Bennett
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
contact info
Glenn D. Pomerantz
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
contact info
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee
TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION
Represented By
Kelly M. Klaus
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
contact info
Rose Leda Ehler
Munger Tolles & Olson, LLP
contact info
Donald Beaton Verrilli Jr.
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
contact info
Allyson R. Bennett
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
contact info
Glenn D. Pomerantz
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
contact info
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee
WARNER BROTHERS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Represented By
Kelly M. Klaus
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
contact info
Rose Leda Ehler
Munger Tolles & Olson, LLP
contact info
Donald Beaton Verrilli Jr.
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
contact info
Allyson R. Bennett
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
contact info
Glenn D. Pomerantz
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
contact info

GPO Aug 24 2017
FILED OPINION (CARLOS T. BEA, ANDREW D. HURWITZ and LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI) AFFIRMED. Judge: ADH Authoring, FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [10556053]

Docket last updated: 08/28/2017 1:32 AM PDT
Thursday, December 15, 2016
1 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/22/2016. FRAP 3-3. [10234275] (JN) [Entered: 12/15/2016 09:00 AM]
Related: [-]
2 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: ME): The appeal filed December 14, 2016 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due not later than January 11, 2017; the answering brief is due February 8, 2017 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). The parties are reminded that streamlined requests for extensions of time are not available in preliminary injunction appeals. See http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/content/view.php?pk_id=0000000638. Any request for an extension of time must be requested under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [10235315] (ME) [Entered: 12/15/2016 02:37 PM]
Related: [-]