Pennsylvania Middle District Court
Judge:Joseph F Saporito, Jr
Case #: 3:17-cv-01050
Nature of Suit890 Other Statutes - Other Statutory Actions
Cause15:1601 Truth in Lending
Case Filed:Jun 15, 2017
Re-opened:Jan 13, 2022
Terminated:Apr 07, 2023
Last checked: Tuesday Dec 12, 2017 4:05 AM EST
Defendant
ACRE MORTGAGE & FINANCIAL, INC.
Represented By
P. Brennan Hart
Pietraglio Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, LLP
contact info
Joel B. Albert
Law Offices Of Joel B. Albert, P.C.
contact info
DOUGLAS KEITH ROSENBLUM
Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, LLP
contact info
Defendant
CLASSIC QUALITY HOMES
Represented By
Michael A. John
Gazan & John, PC
contact info
Michael V Gazza
The Law Office Of Michael V. Gazza
contact info
Plaintiff
BRIGITTE NELSON
Represented By
Kevin J Kotch
Ferrara Law Group, P.C.
contact info
Richard H Kim
The Kim Law Firm, LLC
contact info
TERMINATED PARTIES
Defendant
BORDERTOWN APPRAISALS
Terminated: 01/30/2017
Defendant
THE MONEY SOURCE
Terminated: 01/30/2017
Defendant
ROSE VAN DOVER
Terminated: 01/30/2017

GPO Sep 25 2020
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 70 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ACRE MORTGAGE & FINANCIAL, INC. For the reasons set forth above, Acre Mortgages motion for summary judgment will be granted in part and denied in part as moot. It will be granted with respect to the plaintiffs TILA and RESPA claims set forth in Count One of the Amended Complaint. The plaintiffs state-law claims against both defendants will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). As a result, the remainder of Acre Mortgages motion for summary judgment will be denied as moot.An appropriate order follows. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 9/25/20. (ms)
GPO Jan 26 2022
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 1/26/22. (ep)
GPO Jan 26 2022
ORDER denying 103 Motion to Stay Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 1/26/22 (ep)
GPO Sep 28 2022
nd denied in part. The motion is granted with respect to the plaintiffs state-law claims against Acre, but, pursuant to the mandate of the Third Circuit, it is denied with respect to the plaintiffs federal claims under TILA and Regulation Z and under RESPA and Regulation X.Summary judgment will be granted against the plaintiff with respect to her rescission and conspiracy claims against both defendants, as set forth in Counts Five and Six of the amended complaint, and with respect to her aiding and abetting claim against Acre only, as set forth in Count Seven of the amended complaint. The remaining claimsfederal claims against Acre only under TILA and Regulation Z and under RESPA and Regulation X (Count One), a state-law UTPCPL claim against Classic only (Count Two), a state-law breach of contract claim against Classic only (Count Three), a state-law fraud in the inducement claim against Classic only (Count Four), and a state-law aiding and abetting claim against Classic only (Count Seven)will be set down for trial.An appropriate order follows. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 9/28/22. (ms)MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 70 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ACRE MORTGAGE & FINANCIAL, INC. For the foregoing reasons, defendant Acres motion for summary judgment (Doc. 70) will be granted in part a
GPO Nov 15 2022
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 131 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability FOR AN INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL filed by Brigitte Nelson. The plaintiffs motion for certification of an interlocutory appeal under § 1292(b) will be denied.An appropriate order follows. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 11/15/22. (ms)
GPO Apr 19 2024
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 235 Objections to Bill of Costs filed by Brigitte Nelson. The plaintiff has failed to satisfy her burden of showing that the clerks taxation of costs is improper or inequitable under the circumstances. Accordingly, the plaintiffs objections to the clerks taxation of costs (Doc. 235) will be overruled in their entirety, and the clerks taxation of costs (Doc. 234) will be affirmed.An appropriate order follows. Signed by Chief MJ Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 4/19/24. (ms)
GPO Apr 19 2024
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) Signed by Chief MJ Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 4/19/24. (ms)(Copy to Financial and H. Snell from Chambers)

Docket last updated: 11/06/2024 11:59 PM EST
Friday, April 19, 2024
237 237 1 pgs order Order (Memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) Fri 04/19 12:42 PM
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) Signed by Chief MJ Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 4/19/24. (ms)(Copy to Financial and H. Snell from Chambers)
Related: [-]
236 236 5 pgs order Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry) Fri 04/19 12:35 PM
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re235 Objections to Bill of Costs filed by Brigitte Nelson. The plaintiff has failed to satisfy her burden of showing that the clerks taxation of costs is improper or inequitable under the circumstances. Accordingly, the plaintiffs objections to the clerks taxation of costs (Doc. 235) will be overruled in their entirety, and the clerks taxation of costs (Doc. 234) will be affirmed.An appropriate order follows. Signed by Chief MJ Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 4/19/24. (ms)
Related: [-]
Wednesday, April 17, 2024
235 235 misc Objections to Bill of Costs Wed 04/17 3:50 PM
OBJECTIONS TO BILL OF COSTS by Brigitte Nelson to221 Bill of Costs.(ao)
Related: [-]
Att: 1 Exhibit One,
Att: 2 Exhibit Two,
Att: 3 Exhibit Three,
Att: 4 Exhibit Four,
Att: 5 Exhibit Five,
Att: 6 Exhibit Six,
Att: 7 Exhibit Seven