hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corporation
Original Case: 3:17-cv-03301
| Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals | |
| Case #: | 0:17-cv-16783 |
| Type | civil / private |
| Nature of Suit | 820 Property Rights - Copyrights |
| Case Filed: | Sep 06, 2017 |
| Terminated: | Sep 09, 2019 |
| Last checked: Wednesday Sep 11, 2019 1:35 AM PDT |
|
Amicus Curiae
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
CRAIGSLIST, INC.
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
3TAPS, INC.
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, DUCKDUCKGO, AND INTERNET ARCHIVE
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
SCRAPING HUB, LTD.
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellant
LINKEDIN CORPORATION
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
HIQ LABS, INC.
|
Represented By
|
GPO
Sep 09 2019
FILED OPINION (J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, MARSHA S. BERZON and TERRENCE BERG) AFFIRMED. Judge: JCW Concurring, Judge: MSB Authoring. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [11424311] |
|
|
GPO
Apr 18 2022
FILED OPINION (J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, MARSHA S. BERZON and TERRENCE BERG) We AFFIRM the district courtâ??s determination that hiQ has established the elements required for a preliminary injunction and remand for further proceedings. Judge: MSB Authoring. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [12423528] |
| 1. | EFF to Court: Accessing Publicly Available Information on the Internet Is Not a Crime (eff.org) |
| Submitted Thu 12/14/2017 | |
| Docket last updated: 11/09/2022 3:43 PM PST |
| Wednesday, September 06, 2017 | ||
| 1 | 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: To be set. Preliminary Injunction, C.R. 3-3 [10570561] (JBS) [Entered: 09/06/2017 11:15 AM] | |
|
Att: 1
1 pgs
Docketing Letter
|
||
|
Att: 2
2 pgs
Mediation Letter
|
||
|
Att: 3
2 pgs
Mediation Questionnaire
|
||
|
Att: 4
9 pgs
Case Opening Packet
|
||
| 2 | 2
2
pgs
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: ME): The appeal filed September 5, 2017 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due not later than October 3, 2017; the answering brief is due October 31, 2017 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). The parties are reminded that streamlined requests for extensions of time are not available in preliminary injunction appeals. See http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/content/view.php?pk_id=0000000638. Any request for an extension of time must be requested under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [10571779] (ME) [Entered: 09/06/2017 05:11 PM]
|
|