City of Oakland v. Loretta E. Lynch, et al
Original Case: 3:12-cv-05245
| Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals | |
| Case #: | 0:13-cv-15391 |
| Type | civil / united states |
| Nature of Suit | 899 Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| Case Filed: | Feb 28, 2013 |
| Terminated: | Aug 20, 2015 |
| Last checked: Friday Feb 19, 2016 12:41 AM PST |
|
Defendant - Appellee
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellee
MELINDA HAAG, United States Attorney for the Northern District of California
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
CITY OF OAKLAND
|
Represented By
|
GPO
Aug 20 2015
FILED OPINION (RICHARD C. TALLMAN, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON and STEPHEN JOSEPH MURPHY, III) AFFIRMED. Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal. Judge: SJM Authoring. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [9653572] |
| 1. | Federal court rejects Oakland's bid to save giant medical pot dispensary (latimes.com) |
| Submitted Thu 08/20/2015 | |
| Docket last updated: 08/20/2015 3:02 PM PDT |
| Thursday, February 28, 2013 | ||
| 1 | 1
DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/07/2013. Transcript ordered by 03/29/2013. Transcript due 04/29/2013. Appellant City of Oakland opening brief due 06/07/2013. Appellees Melinda Haag and Eric H. Holder Jr., Attorney General answering brief due 07/08/2013. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8531088] (RT) [Entered: 02/28/2013 11:58 AM]
|
|