Leroy Haeger, et al v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Com
Original Case: 2:05-cv-02046
| Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals | |
| Case #: | 0:13-cv-16801 |
| Type | civil / private |
| Nature of Suit | 355 Torts - Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| Case Filed: | Sep 06, 2013 |
| Terminated: | Jun 08, 2017 |
| Last checked: Monday Jun 12, 2017 1:34 AM PDT |
|
Defendant - Appellant
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, an Ohio corporation
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
LEROY HAEGER
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
DONNA HAEGER, husband and wife
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
BARRY HAEGER
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
SUZANNE HAEGER, husband and wife
|
Represented By
|
GPO
Jul 20 2015
FILED OPINION (J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and PAUL J. WATFORD) AFFIRMED. The Sanctionees shall bear all costs in this appeal. Judge: MDS Authoring, Judge: PJW Dissenting. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [9615023] [12-17718, 13-16801, 13-16861, 13-16862] |
|
|
GPO
Feb 16 2016
Filed order and amended opinion (J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and PAUL J. WATFORD). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED; The opinion and dissent filed on July 20, 2015 and published at 793 F.3d 1122 are hereby amended. The amended opinion and dissent are filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, Judge M. Smith voted to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc, and Judge Wallace so recommends. Judge Watford voted to grant the petitions. The full court was advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED. Future petitions for panel rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc will not be entertained.. The Sanctionees shall bear all costs in this appeal. [9865156] [12-17718, 13-16801, 13-16861, 13-16862] |
| 1. | Federal appeals court upholds ruling in Goodyear tire lawsuit (cvbugle.com) |
| Submitted Wed 07/22/2015 | |
| Docket last updated: 06/12/2017 1:29 AM PDT |
| Friday, September 06, 2013 | ||
| 1 | 1
DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/13/2013. Transcript ordered by 10/07/2013. Transcript due 11/05/2013. Appellant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company opening brief due 12/16/2013. Appellees Barry Haeger, Donna Haeger, Leroy Haeger and Suzanne Haeger answering brief due 01/15/2014. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8772515] (GR) [Entered: 09/06/2013 02:31 PM]
|
|
| 2 | 2 Added attorney George Brandon for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company,. [8772931] (GR) [Entered: 09/06/2013 04:06 PM] | |