BlackBerry Limited v. Snap Inc.

Consolidated
Lead case: 2:18-cv-01844

California Central District Court
Judge:	George H Wu
Referred:	Karen L Stevenson
Case #:	2:18-cv-02693
Nature of Suit	830 Property Rights - Patent
Cause	35:271 Patent Infringement

Case Filed:	Apr 03, 2018
Terminated:	Nov 15, 2019

Last checked: Sunday Sep 30, 2018 1:41 AM PDT

Counter Claimant Snap Inc.	Represented By Michael C Hendershot Paul Hastings LLP contact info Anthony J Tartaglio Paul Hastings LLP contact info Chad J Peterman Paul Hastings LLP contact info Philip Ou Paul Hastings LLP contact info David T Okano Paul Hastings LLP contact info Yar R Chaikovsky Paul Hastings LLP contact info Thomas Peter O'Brien Paul Hastings LLP contact info
Counter Defendant BlackBerry Limited	Represented By Ray R Zado Quinn Emanuel Urquhart And Sullivan LLP contact info James R Asperger Quinn Emanuel Urquhart And Sullivan LLP contact info Jordan R Jaffe Quinn Emanuel Urquhart And Sullivan LLP contact info Edward R McGah, Jr Blackberry Carporation contact info Kevin P B Johnson Quinn Emanuel Urquhart And Sullivan LLP contact info Victoria F Maroulis Quinn Emanuel Urquhart And Sullivan LLP contact info
Defendant Snap Inc.	Represented By Michael C Hendershot Paul Hastings LLP contact info Anthony J Tartaglio Paul Hastings LLP contact info Thomas A Zaccaro Paul Hastings LLP contact info Chad J Peterman Paul Hastings LLP contact info Philip Ou Paul Hastings LLP contact info David T Okano Paul Hastings LLP contact info Yar R Chaikovsky Paul Hastings LLP contact info Thomas Peter O'Brien Paul Hastings LLP contact info Yar R. Chaikovsky Paul Hastings LLP contact info
Plaintiff BlackBerry Limited	Represented By Ray R Zado Quinn Emanuel Urquhart And Sullivan LLP contact info James R Asperger Quinn Emanuel Urquhart And Sullivan LLP contact info Jordan R Jaffe Quinn Emanuel Urquhart And Sullivan LLP contact info Edward R McGah, Jr Blackberry Carporation contact info Kevin P B Johnson Quinn Emanuel Urquhart And Sullivan LLP contact info Victoria F Maroulis Quinn Emanuel Urquhart And Sullivan LLP contact info

1.	Will A BlackBerry Lawsuit End Snapchat? (seekingalpha.com)
	Submitted Fri 04/13/2018

Docket last updated: 9 hours ago

Thursday, January 21, 2021
125		125 notice Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123) Thu 01/21 2:17 PM Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Yar R Chaikovsky counsel for Defendant Snap Inc.. Kimberly Zapata is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Snap Inc.. (Chaikovsky, Yar) Related: [-]
Wednesday, January 20, 2021
		textonly Text Only Bounced Notice of Electronic Filing E-mail Wed 01/20 11:32 AM Notice of Electronic Filing re USCA Mandate,123 e-mailed to kimberlyzapata@paulhastings.com bounced due to 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-'5.4.1 Recipient address rejected: Access denied. AS(201806281) [DM6NAM12FT060.eop-nam12.prod.protection.outlook.com]'. The primary e-mail address associated with the attorney record has been deleted. Pursuant to Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ew) Related: [-]
Tuesday, January 19, 2021
123		123 appeal USCA Mandate Wed 01/20 10:15 AM MANDATE of Federal Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, CCA # 2020-1258. In accordance with the judgment of this Court, entered December 10, 2020, and pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the formal mandate is hereby issued. Costs are awarded to Appellee Snap Inc. in the amount of $52.32 and taxed against the appellant. [See USCA JUDGMENT122 AFFIRMED.](mat) Related: [-]

Continue to Create Account