United States of America et al v. INSYS Therapeutic Inc
| California Central District Court | |
| Judge: | Josephine L Staton |
| Referred: | Andrew J Wistrich |
| Case #: | 2:13-cv-05861 |
| Nature of Suit | 375 Other Statutes - False Claims Act |
| Cause | 31:3729 False Claims Act |
| Case Filed: | Aug 12, 2013 |
| Terminated: | Aug 16, 2021 |
| Last checked: Thursday May 31, 2018 12:10 PM PDT |
|
Defendant
Michael Babich
|
|
|
Defendant
Alec Burlakoff
|
|
|
Defendant
INSYS Therapeutic Inc
|
|
|
Defendant
John N Kapoor
|
|
|
Defendant
Does 2 through 15
|
|
|
Intervenor Defendant
Insys Therapeutics Inc
|
|
|
Intervenor Defendant
Michael Babich
|
|
|
Intervenor Defendant
Alec Burlakoff
|
|
|
Intervenor Defendant
Does 1 through 15
|
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of Louisiana
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of Michigan
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of Oklahoma
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of Hawaii
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of Indiana
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of Illinois
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of Rhode Island
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of Florida
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of Minnesota
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of North Carolina
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of Montana
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of Nevada
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of New York
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of New Hampshire
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of New Jersey
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of New Mexico
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of Georgia
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
United States of America
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
Commonwealth of Virginia
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
District of Columbia
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of Washington
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State Of California
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of Texas
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of Delaware
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor Plaintiff
State of Tennessee
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
State of North Carolina
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of Texas
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of Tennessee
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of Oklahoma
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of New York
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of Washington
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of Indiana
|
|
|
Plaintiff
United States of America
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
State of New Mexico
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of Rhode Island
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of New Hampshire
|
|
|
Plaintiff
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
|
|
|
Plaintiff
Commonwealth of Virginia
|
|
|
Plaintiff
District of Columbia
|
|
|
Plaintiff
Maria Guzman
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
State of California
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of Delaware
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of Florida
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of Georgia
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of Hawaii
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of Illinois
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of Louisiana
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of Michigan
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of Minnesota
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of Montana
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of Nevada
|
|
|
Plaintiff
State of New Jersey
|
|
| TERMINATED PARTIES | |
|
Defendant
Does 1 through 15
Terminated: 06/13/2016
|
|
| 1. | "Behave more sexually:" How Big Pharma used strippers, guns, and cash to push opioids (motherjones.com) |
| Submitted Thu 05/31/2018 | |
| Docket last updated: 11/25/2024 11:59 PM PST |
| Tuesday, March 29, 2022 | ||
| 174 | 174
judgmentCV
Judgment
Tue 03/29 2:54 PM
FINAL AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: (1) All claims brought by or on behalf of the United States against Insys are dismissed (a) with prejudice to the United States with respect to the Covered Conduct as that term is defined in the Settlement Agreement between the United States and Insys, (b) without prejudice to the United States with respect to all other claims, and (c) with prejudice to the relator. (2) All remaining federal claims against all other defendants in this action are dismissed without prejudice to the United States and the relator. (3) All remaining state-law claims are dismissed without prejudice to the states and the relator. (4) This action is dismissed in its entirety. Related to: Stipulation for Order173 . (jp) |
|