Huu Nguyen v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Original Case: 5:16-cv-05591

Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
Case #:	0:18-cv-16344
Type	civil / private
Nature of Suit	370 Torts - Personal Property - Other Fraud

Case Filed:	Jul 20, 2018
Terminated:	Jul 26, 2019

Last checked: Tuesday Jul 30, 2019 1:34 AM PDT

Amicus Curiae FCA US LLC	Represented By Kathy Wisniewski Thompson Coburn LLP contact info
Amicus Curiae ALLIANCE OF AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS, INC.	Represented By Philip S. Goldberg Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. contact info
Amicus Curiae ASSOCIATION OF GLOBAL AUTOMAKERS	Represented By Philip S. Goldberg Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. contact info
Amicus Curiae CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA	Represented By Ashley Charles Parrish King & Spalding LLP contact info
Amicus Curiae NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS	Represented By Ashley Charles Parrish King & Spalding LLP contact info
Defendant - Appellee NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., a California Corporation	Represented By Marshall Baker Drinker Biddle & Reath, LLP contact info Edwin Paul Cauley Jr. Drinker Biddle Reath LLP contact info Alan Jay Lazarus Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP contact info Adam J. Thurston Drinker Biddle & Reath, LLP contact info Sherman Vance Wittie Drinker Biddle Reath LLP contact info Matthew J. Adler Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP contact info Michael J. Stortz Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP contact info Zoe K. Wilhelm Drinker Biddle & Reath, LLP contact info
Plaintiff - Appellant HUU NGUYEN, individually, and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals	Represented By John Ely Stobart I Capstone Law APC contact info Glenn A. Danas Capstone Law APC contact info Tarek Zohdy Capstone Law APC contact info Ryan Wu Capstone Law APC contact info Cody Robert Padgett Capstone Law APC contact info Jordan L. Lurie Capstone Law APC contact info John Ely Stobart Capstone Law APC contact info

GPO Jul 26 2019
FILED OPINION (MARY M. SCHROEDER, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and DOUGLAS L. RAYES) We conclude that the district court abused its discretion when it denied class certification based on a misconception of Plaintiff�??s legal theory. We therefore REVERSE the district court�??s denial of class certification and REMAND for further proceedings. Judge: MDS Authoring. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [11377479]--[Edited: Attached corrected PDF (corrected typo). 07/26/2019 by SLM]

Docket last updated: 07/30/2019 1:31 AM PDT

Friday, July 20, 2018
1		1 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA and SUSAN P. GRABER, Circuit Judges) in case no. 18-80050 on 7 20-2018 The court, in its discretion, grants the petition for permission to appeal the district court�s April 9, 2018 order denying class action certification. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f); Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co., 402 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2005). Within 14 days after the date of this order, petitioner shall perfect the appeal in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 5(d). [10950094] (RT) [Entered: 07/20/2018 01:32 PM] Related: [-]
2		2 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/27/2018. Transcript ordered by 08/20/2018. Transcript due 09/18/2018. Appellant Huu Nguyen opening brief due 10/29/2018. Appellee Nissan North America, Inc. answering brief due 11/29/2018. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [10950100] (RT) [Entered: 07/20/2018 01:34 PM] Related: [-]
		Att: 1 1 pgs Mediation Letter
		Att: 2 2 pgs Mediation Questionnaire
		Att: 3 9 pgs Case Opening Packet
		Att: 4 3 pgs Docketing Letter

Continue to Create Account