Reo v. Lindstedt

Ohio Northern District Court
Judge:Solomon Oliver, Jr
Referred: Thomas M Parker
Case #: 1:19-cv-02103
Nature of Suit440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights
Cause42:1981 Civil Rights
Case Filed:Sep 12, 2019
Re-opened:Feb 28, 2023
Terminated:Nov 08, 2024
Last checked: Tuesday Mar 10, 2020 4:52 AM EDT
Counter-Claimant
Martin Lindstedt
338 Rabbit Track Road
Granby, MO 64844
Counter-Defendant
Bryan Anthony Reo
Represented By
Bryan A. Reo
Reo Law
contact info
Defendant
Martin Lindstedt
338 Rabbit Track Road
Granby, MO 64844
Plaintiff
Bryan Anthony Reo
P.O. Box 5100
Mentor, OH 44061
Represented By
Bryan A. Reo
Reo Law
contact info

GPO Jun 14 2021
Order: The Court denies Plaintiff's Second Motion to Show Cause (ECF No. 68), Motion for Prejudgment Interest (ECF No. 74), and Motion for Contempt Sanction (ECF No. 75), as well as Defendants Motion to Show Cause (ECF No. 65) and Motion to Reconsider (ECF No. 76). Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 6/14/2021. (S,SR)
GPO Jun 27 2023
Order: For the reasons stated in the Order: plaintiffs' motion for leave to conduct additional discovery (ECF Doc. 93) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; plaintiffs' motion to compel (ECF Doc. 92) is DENIED AS MOOT; plaintiffs' motion to strike and deem requests for admission admitted (ECF Doc. 114) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; plaintiffs' motion to amend or supplement (ECF Doc. 112) is DENIED; defendant Martin Lindstedt's filings in ECF Doc. 98, ECF Doc. 102, ECF Doc. 105, ECF Doc. 106, ECF Doc. 107, ECF Doc. 108, ECF Doc. 109, ECF Doc. 111, ECF Doc. 115, and ECF Doc. 116 are SEALED; plaintiff' remaining motions to strike (ECF Doc. 113, ECF Doc. 121, and ECF Doc. 122) are DENIED AS MOOT. See Order for details. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 6/27/2023. (D,JJ)
GPO Jul 28 2023
Report and Recommendation that Plaintiff Bryan Reo and Plaintiff Stefani Reo's joint motion to dismiss Defendant Martin Lindstedt's counterclaims (ECF Doc. 94) be construed as a motion for judgment on the pleadings and GRANTED in part: (1) as to Lindstedt's counterclaims against Bryan Reo and Stefani Reo for malicious prosecution and abuse of process; and (2) as to Lindstedt's counterclaim against Bryan Reo for civil conspiracy. Further, it is recommended that the plaintiffs' motion be DENIED in part as to Lindstedt's counterclaims against Bryan Reo and Stefani Reo for defamation per se. Objections to Report & Recommendation due by 8/11/2023. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 7/28/2023. (D,JJ)
GPO Sep 12 2023
Order adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in its entirety, re 129. Therefore, the court will treat the Motion to Dismiss as a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings by husband and wife Plaintiffs, Bryan Anthony Reo and Stefani Rossi Reo, with respect to the Counterclaims of Defendant, Martin Lindstedt. Considered as such, the court will grant the Motion (ECF No. 94) in part and deny it in part. Specifically, the court grants the Motion with respect to the malicious prosecution and abuse of process claims against Bryan and Stefani and the civil conspiracy and spoliation of evidence claims again Bryan. Judgment is hereby entered accordingly with respect to those claims. However, the court denies the Motion with respect to the defamation per se claim against Bryan and Stefani. Related documents 94, 129. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 9/12/2023. (R,Sh)
GPO Sep 13 2023
Report and Recommendation that Plaintiff Bryan Reo and Plaintiff Stefani Reo's motion to dismiss (ECF Doc. 130) be construed as a motion for summary judgment and DISMISSED as successive and improperly filed. Objections to Report & Recommendation due by 9/27/2023. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 9/13/2023. (D,JJ)
GPO Mar 22 2024
Order Adopting the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Parker in its entirety. In the R&R, he recommended that the court construe the Motion as a Motion for Summary Judgment, and deny it as successive and improperly filed. Plaintiff filed Objections to the R&R on September 15, 2023(ECF No. 145). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the Objections thereto, the court finds the Objections are not well taken. Further the court finds that the Magistrate Judge's recommendation is well taken and hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The Motion is dismissed as successive and improperly filed. Related document 130. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 3/22/2024. (R,Sh)
GPO Mar 22 2024
Order Adopting the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Parker in its entirety. In the R&R, he recommended that the court construe the Motion as a Motion for Summary Judgment, and deny it as successive and improperly filed. Plaintiff filed Objections to the R&R on September 15, 2023 (ECF No. 145). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the Objections thereto, the court finds the Objections are not well taken. Further the court finds that the Magistrate Judge's recommendation is well taken and hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety 144. The Motion is dismissed as successive and improperly filed. Related document 130. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 3/22/2024. (R,Sh)
GPO Sep 16 2024
Order Adopting the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Parker, thereby denying Plaintiffs' request for default judgment and adopting the Magistrates recommendation to consider imposing lesser sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37. Plaintiffs' counsel represented to the court that Plaintiffs want to sever the cases to try them separately. Plaintiffs have 14 days from the date of this Order to file a Motion to Sever. Defendant then has 10 days to respond to the Motion. Plaintiffs need not file a Reply. Given the complex nature of the case, the court modified the following time frames fromthose listed in the court's August 13, 2024 Trial Order (ECF No. 167) as herein stated. Related documents 155, 160. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 9/16/2024. (R,Sh)

Docket last updated: 01/01/2025 11:59 PM EST
Friday, December 27, 2024
238 238 notice Notice (atty event) Fri 12/27 10:12 AM
Notice of Opposition to Defendant's Emailed Request Emailed to Court 12/26/2024 filed by Bryan Anthony Reo, Bryan Anthony Reo. Related [+]
Related: [-] o, Bryan