Niblock et al v. University of Kentucky et al
Kentucky Eastern District Court | |
Judge: | Karen K Caldwell |
Referred: | Edward B Atkins |
Case #: | 5:19-cv-00394 |
Nature of Suit | 448 Civil Rights - Education |
Cause | 20:1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination |
Case Filed: | Sep 25, 2019 |
Terminated: | Oct 28, 2024 |
Last checked: Monday Mar 23, 2020 5:53 AM EDT |
Defendant
Mitch Barnhart
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Eli Capilouto
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
University of Kentucky
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Elizabeth Niblock
|
Represented By
|
TERMINATED PARTIES | |
Defendant
Board of Trustees
Terminated: 01/23/2020
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Meredith Newman
Terminated: 10/11/2019
|
Represented By
|
1. | Title IX lawsuit accuses University of Kentucky of discriminating against female athletes (wkyt.com) |
Submitted Thu 09/26/2019 | |
Docket last updated: 11/24/2024 11:59 PM EST |
Monday, October 28, 2024 | ||
171 | 171
1
pgs
order
Judgment
Mon 10/28 3:24 PM
JUDGMENT: 1) Judgment is entered in favor of the University of Kentucky on Plaintiffs' Title IX claim; 2) Plaintiffs' Equal Protection claim against Mitch Barnhart and Eli Capilouto in their official capacities is DISMISSED with prejudice; 3) this Judgment is FINAL and APPEALABLE; and 4) this matter is STRICKEN from the Court's active docket. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 10/28/24.(JLM) |
|
170 | 170
31
pgs
order
Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law
Mon 10/28 3:17 PM
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: 1) Plaintiffs have failed to prove that the selection of sports and levels of competition at UK do not effectively accommodate the interests and abilities of UK's female students; 2) Judgment will be entered in favor of UK on Plaintiffs' Title IX claim; 3) Plaintiffs' Equal Protection claim against Mitch Barnhart and Eli Capilouto in their official capacities is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 4) UK's motion to reconsider (DE167 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 10/28/24.(JLM) |