Norwich v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
Consolidated
Lead case: 1:17-md-02804
Lead case: 1:17-md-02804
Ohio Northern District Court | |
Judge: | Dan Aaron Polster |
Case #: | 1:19-op-45840 |
Nature of Suit | 367 Torts - Personal Injury - Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury/Product Liability |
Cause | No cause code entered |
Case Filed: | Oct 02, 2019 |
Case in other court: | Connecticut, 3:19-cv-00770 |
Last checked: Friday Nov 08, 2019 8:26 PM EST |
Defendant
Allergan PLC, f/k/a Actavis, Inc., f/k/a Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
Defendant
Kathe Sackler
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Mortimer D.A. Sackler
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Dr. Richard Sackler
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Theresa Sackler
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
jonathan Sackler
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Ilene Sackler Lefcourt
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
SpecGX LLC
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Walmart Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Watson Laboratories Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
ALLERGAN PLC, f/k/a ACTAVIS PLC
|
|
Defendant
Actavis Pharma, Inc f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc.
|
|
Defendant
Allergan Finance LLC f/k/a Actavis Inc, f/k/a Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
Defendant
David Sackler
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Cardinal Health 110, LLC as successor-in-interest of Kinray, LLC
|
|
Defendant
Caremark Rx, L.L.C.
|
|
Defendant
Caremark, L.L.C.
|
|
Defendant
CaremarkPCS Health, L.L.C. f/k/a Caremark PCS Health, L.P. d/b/a CVS Caremark
|
|
Defendant
Express Scripts Holding Company
|
|
Defendant
Express Scripts, Inc.
|
|
Defendant
H.D. Smith, LLC f/k/a H.D. Smith Wholesale Drug Company
|
|
Defendant
Hickma Pharmaceuticals PLC
|
|
Defendant
Omnicare, Inc.
|
|
Defendant
Optum, Inc.
|
|
Defendant
OptumRX, Inc.
|
|
Defendant
OptumRx Administrative Services, LLC
|
|
Defendant
Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
|
|
Defendant
Sandoz Inc.
|
|
Defendant
Johnson & Johnson
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Actavis Inc
874 Walker Road, Suite C
Dover, DE 19904 |
Represented By
|
Defendant
Actavis LLC
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Actavis Pharma, Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Allergan PLC
|
|
Defendant
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
CVS Health Corporation
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
CVS Pharmacy Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Cardinal Health Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Cephalon Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
|
|
Defendant
Endo Health Solutions Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Insys Therapeutics, Inc.
|
|
Defendant
Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
John Kapoor
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Mallinckrodt LLC
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
McKesson Corporation
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Purdue Frederick Company Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Purdue Pharma Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Purdue Pharma L.P.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
RHODES TECHNOLOGIES
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Rhodes Pharmaceuticals Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Rhodes Pharmaceuticals L.P.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Rhodes Technologies Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
|
|
Defendant
Beverly Sackler
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
City of Norwich
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 10/08/2019 9:59 AM EDT |
Tuesday, May 21, 2019 | ||
Judge Michael P. Shea added. (Oliver, T.) [Transferred from ctd on 10/2/2019.] | ||
1 | 1
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |
||
Att: 4
![]() |
||
Att: 5
![]() |
||
2 | 2
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
3 | 3
![]() |
|
4 | 4
![]() |
|
5 | 5
![]() |
|
6 | 6
![]() |
|
7 | 7
![]() |
|
8 | 8
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Thursday, May 23, 2019 | ||
9 | 9
![]() |
|
10 | 10
![]() |
|
Friday, May 24, 2019 | ||
11 | 11
![]() |
|
12 | 12
![]() |
|
13 | 13
![]() |
|
14 | 14
![]() |
|
15 | 15
![]() |
|
16 | 16
![]() |
|
17 | 17
![]() |
|
18 | 18
![]() |
|
19 | 19
![]() |
|
20 | 20
![]() |
|
21 | 21
![]() |
|
22 | 22
![]() |
|
23 | 23
![]() |
|
24 | 24
![]() |
|
25 | 25
![]() |
|
26 | 26
![]() |
|
27 | 27
![]() |
|
28 | 28
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Tuesday, May 28, 2019 | ||
29 | 29
![]() |
|
30 | 30
![]() |
|
31 | 31
![]() |
|
32 | 32
![]() |
|
33 | 33
![]() |
|
34 | 34
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
35 | 35
![]() |
|
36 | 36
![]() |
|
37 | 37
![]() |
|
Wednesday, May 29, 2019 | ||
38 | 38
![]() |
|
39 | 39
![]() |
|
40 | 40 ORDER. The25 ,28 ,31 ,35 , and38 consented motions for extension of time are GRANTED as follows. All defendants' deadline to respond to the complaint and to conduct the Rule 26(f) planning conference is extended until 60 days after this Court rules on any motion to remand or the Judicial Panel of Multidistrict Litigation's decision on a conditional transfer, whichever is later. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 5/29/2019. (Barclay, Michael) [Transferred from ctd on 10/2/2019.] | |
41 | 41
![]() |
|
Monday, June 03, 2019 | ||
42 | 42
![]() |
|
Tuesday, June 04, 2019 | ||
43 | 43
![]() |
|
44 | 44
![]() |
|
45 | 45
![]() |
|
Wednesday, June 05, 2019 | ||
46 | 46
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |
||
Att: 4
![]() |
||
Att: 5
![]() |
||
Att: 6
![]() |
||
Friday, June 07, 2019 | ||
47 | 47
![]() |
|
48 | 48
![]() |
|
Monday, June 10, 2019 | ||
49 | 49
![]() |
|
Tuesday, June 11, 2019 | ||
50 | 50
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
51 | 51
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
52 | 52
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
53 | 53
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Wednesday, June 12, 2019 | ||
54 | 54 ORDER granting50 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting51 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting52 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Certificate of Good Standing due by 8/11/2019. Signed by Clerk on 06/12/2019. (Peterson, M) [Transferred from ctd on 10/2/2019.] | |
55 | 55
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
56 | 56
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Thursday, June 13, 2019 | ||
57 | 57 ORDER granting55 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting56 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Certificate of Good Standing due by 8/12/2019. Signed by Clerk on 06/13/2019. (Peterson, M) [Transferred from ctd on 10/2/2019.] | |
58 | 58 ORDER. The46 motion to stay is GRANTED. This case is hereby STAYED until the JPML issues a final decision on whether to transfer this action to the MDL. If the JPML decides not to transfer the action, any party may file a motion to lift the stay within 7 days of such decision, attaching a copy of the decision to the motion. The Court will then set a briefing schedule on any motion to remand. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 6/13/2019. (Barclay, Michael) [Transferred from ctd on 10/2/2019.] | |
Tuesday, June 18, 2019 | ||
59 | 59
![]() |
|
Wednesday, June 19, 2019 | ||
60 | 60
![]() |
|
61 | 61
![]() |
|
62 | 62
![]() |
|
63 | 63
![]() |
|
64 | 64
![]() |
|
65 | 65
![]() |
|
Thursday, June 20, 2019 | ||
66 | 66
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Friday, June 21, 2019 | ||
67 | 67 ORDER granting66 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Certificate of Good Standing due by 8/20/2019. Signed by Clerk on 06/21/2019. (Peterson, M) [Transferred from ctd on 10/2/2019.] | |
Wednesday, June 26, 2019 | ||
68 | 68
![]() |
|
69 | 69
![]() |
|
70 | 70
![]() |
|
71 | 71
![]() |
|
Friday, June 28, 2019 | ||
JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Peterson, M) [Transferred from ctd on 10/2/2019.] | ||
72 | 72
![]() |
|
Wednesday, October 02, 2019 | ||
73 | 73
![]() |