Bishelli v. Monsanto Company
Consolidated
Lead case: 3:16-md-02741
Lead case: 3:16-md-02741
California Northern District Court | |
Judge: | Vince Chhabria |
Case #: | 3:19-cv-06095 |
Nature of Suit | 365 Torts - Personal Injury - Product Liability |
Cause | 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Case Filed: | Sep 25, 2019 |
Case in other court: | Colorado, 1:19-cv-02356 |
Last checked: Monday Mar 23, 2020 1:31 AM PDT |
Defendant
Monsanto Company
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Charlotte Bishelli
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 11 hours ago |
Tuesday, November 12, 2019 | ||
19 | 19
![]() ANSWER to Amended Complaint byMonsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) |
|
18 | 18
![]() Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) |
|
17 | 17
![]() Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) |
|
Thursday, October 03, 2019 | ||
16 | 16
![]() Case transferred in from District of Colorado; Case Number 1:19-cv-02356. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
utility
MDL Member Case
Thu 10/03 2:28 PM
MEMBER CASE OPENED: re 3:16-md-02741-VC; District of Colorado, 1:19-cv-02356 Bishelli v. Monsanto, opened in California Northern District as 3:19-cv-06095-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 153 cc: JPMDL (wsnS-adi, COURT STAFF) |
||
Wednesday, September 25, 2019 | ||
15 | 15
![]() |
|
Wednesday, September 04, 2019 | ||
14 | 14
![]() |
|
13 | 13 ORDER: Counsel for the parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Revised Practice Standards (as most recently revised effective December 1, 2018 and as they may be amended from time to time), which may be downloaded here. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/ 4/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) | |
12 | 12 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Magistrate Judge Neureiter, or such other Magistrate Judge who may in the future be reassigned to this case, is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). ALSO ORDERED that unless service has otherwise been completed or arranged, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to effect service of the summons and complaint pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 30 days from the date of this Referral Order, in order for the initial scheduling conference to be held promptly. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/4/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) | |
11 | 11 ORDER: This matter is before the Court on the filing of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint9 : Based on its review of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, the Court is satisfied it has diversity jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. As a consequence, the Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/4/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) | |
Monday, September 02, 2019 | ||
10 | 10
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
9 | 9
![]() |
|
Friday, August 30, 2019 | ||
8 | 8 ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand7 . Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is STRICKEN for failure to comply with D.C.Colo.L.Civ.R. 15.1(a). Plaintiff is DIRECTED to re-file her Amended Complaint in compliance with the Local Rules no later than September 3, 2019 . SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/30/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) | |
Wednesday, August 21, 2019 | ||
7 | 7
![]() |
|
6 | 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE returnable August 28, 2019. The Court has a duty to sua sponte consider its subject matter jurisdiction. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Plaintiff claims jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 based on the diversity of the parties. The Court "must rigorously enforce Congress' intent to restrict federal jurisdiction in controversies between citizens of different states." Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp. , 251 F.3d 1284, 1289 (10th Cir. 2001) abrogated on other grounds by Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 135 S. Ct. 547 (2014)). Plaintiff's Complaint lacks any factual allegations which plausibly allege that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, by August 28, 2019 , as to why the Court should not on its own motion dismiss this action based on Plaintiff's failure to allege facts sufficient to show that the Court has diversity jurisdiction over this matter. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/21/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) | |
Tuesday, August 20, 2019 | ||
5 | 5
![]() |
|
Friday, August 16, 2019 | ||
4 | 4
![]() |
|
3 | 3 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) | |
2 | 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES:re:1 Complaint filed by attorneyJason Edward Ochs. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must submit a change of contact request through the Attorney Services Portal Account pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases).(Text Only Entry) (cmadr, ) | |
1 | 1
![]() |