Gonzalez v. Monsanto Company, Inc.
Consolidated
Lead case: 3:16-md-02741
Lead case: 3:16-md-02741
California Northern District Court | |
Judge: | Vince Chhabria |
Case #: | 3:19-cv-07392 |
Nature of Suit | 365 Torts - Personal Injury - Product Liability |
Cause | 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Case Filed: | Nov 08, 2019 |
Case in other court: | Illinois Northern, 1:19-cv-06420 |
Last checked: Wednesday May 06, 2020 1:53 AM PDT |
Defendant
Monsanto Company, Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Tomas Gonzalez
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 12 hours ago |
Monday, November 25, 2019 | ||
10 | 10
answer
Answer to Complaint
Mon 11/25 8:16 AM
ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand byMonsanto Company, Inc.. (Hollingsworth, Joe) |
|
9 | 9
notice
Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures
Mon 11/25 8:15 AM
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company, Inc.. (Hollingsworth, Joe) |
|
8 | 8
notice
Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures
Mon 11/25 8:14 AM
Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company, Inc.. (Hollingsworth, Joe) |
|
Tuesday, November 12, 2019 | ||
7 | 7
transfer
Case Transferred In - District Transfer
Tue 11/12 8:25 AM
Case transferred in from District of Illinois Northern; Case Number 1:19-cv-06420. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
utility
MDL Member Case
Tue 11/12 5:22 PM
MEMBER CASE OPENED: re 3:16-md-02741-VC; Northern District of Illinois, 19-06420 Gonzalez, opened in California Northern District as 19-07392 pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 164 cc: JPMDL (wsnS-adi, COURT STAFF) |
||
Thursday, November 07, 2019 | ||
6 | 6 TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of California, the electronic record. (aee, ) | |
5 | 5 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from MDL Panel transferring case to the Northern District of California. (aee, ) | |
Thursday, October 03, 2019 | ||
4 | 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Pursuant to General Order 17-0005 this case falls within the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Project, and the "Standing Order in MIDP Cases" now governs the conduct of the litigants in this matter. Under the MIDP, this Court shall enforce the MIDP Standing Order via the Court's inherent authority (including the contempt of court power) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Consequently, both the parties and their attorneys are hereby ordered to review and fully comply with the MIDP Standing Order, which is available on the Court's homepage: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/MIDP Standing Order.pdf. The parties are further advised that in light of the MIDP's intended goal of reducing the traditional cost and delay of federal civil litigation, this Court will not grant routine motions for extensions of time to meet the deadlines imposed by the MIDP Standing Order (even agreed motions made jointly by the parties). During the course of the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312)818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. The litigants are further ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's own standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Court's official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. An initial status conference is hereby set for 11/14/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. At the status conference, the Court will discuss the MIDP and ask the parties questions to verify that they have reviewed and complied with the MIDP Standing Order. Without exception, the parties must also file a status report no later than 11/4/2019, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. Mailed notice (gel, ) | |
Tuesday, October 01, 2019 | ||
3 | 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Tomas Gonzalez by Bryce Thomas Hensley (Hensley, Bryce) | |
Monday, September 30, 2019 | ||
2 | 2 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (aee, ) | |
Friday, September 27, 2019 | ||
1 | 1 COMPLAINT filed by Tomas Gonzalez; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16280099.(Hensley, Bryce) | |
Att: 1 Civil Cover Sheet | ||
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ng, ) | ||
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Monsanto Company, Inc. (acm, ) |