Davis v. Monsanto Company
Consolidated
Lead case: 3:16-md-02741
Lead case: 3:16-md-02741
California Northern District Court | |
Judge: | Vince Chhabria |
Case #: | 3:19-cv-07398 |
Nature of Suit | 365 Torts - Personal Injury - Product Liability |
Cause | 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Case Filed: | Nov 08, 2019 |
Case in other court: | New Mexico, 2:19-cv-00970 |
Last checked: Wednesday May 06, 2020 1:22 AM PDT |
Defendant
Monsanto Company
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Pamela Hays Davis
Miami, FL 33133
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 11 hours ago |
Wednesday, November 27, 2019 | ||
11 | 11
![]() ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand byMonsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) |
|
10 | 10
![]() Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) |
|
9 | 9
![]() Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) |
|
Tuesday, November 12, 2019 | ||
utility
MDL Member Case
Tue 11/12 5:24 PM
MEMBER CASE OPENED: re 3:16-md-02741-VC; District of New Mexico, 19-00970 Davis, opened in California Northern District as 19-07398 pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 164 cc: JPMDL (wsnS-adi, COURT STAFF) |
||
Friday, November 08, 2019 | ||
8 | 8
![]() Case transferred in from District of New Mexico; Case Number 2:19-cv-00970. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Thursday, November 07, 2019 | ||
7 | 7
![]() |
|
Thursday, October 31, 2019 | ||
6 | 6
![]() |
|
Thursday, October 17, 2019 | ||
5 | 5
![]() |
|
Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (dr) | ||
Wednesday, October 16, 2019 | ||
4 | 4
![]() |
|
3 | 3
![]() |
|
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6737652 re1 Complaint filed by Pamela Hays Davis (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Rieder, William) | ||
Tuesday, October 15, 2019 | ||
2 | 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) | |
1 | 1
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (dr) | ||
United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar and United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza assigned. (dr) |