Lydia Olson et al v. State of California et al

California Central District Court
Judge:	Dolly M Gee
Referred:	Rozella A Oliver
Case #:	2:19-cv-10956
Nature of Suit	950 Other Statutes - Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause	28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

Case Filed:	Dec 30, 2019
Terminated:	Jul 16, 2021
Case in other court:	usca, 20-55267

Last checked: Saturday Jun 27, 2020 2:32 AM PDT

Amicus Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America	Represented By Michael J Lotito Littler Mendelson PC contact info James A Paretti, Jr Littler Mendelson PC contact info Bruce J Sarchet Littler Mendelson PC contact info
Amicus Engine Advocacy	Represented By Michael J Lotito Littler Mendelson PC contact info James A Paretti, Jr Littler Mendelson PC contact info Bruce J Sarchet Littler Mendelson PC contact info
Amicus TechNet	Represented By Michael J Lotito Littler Mendelson PC contact info James A Paretti, Jr Littler Mendelson PC contact info Bruce J Sarchet Littler Mendelson PC contact info
Defendant Xavier Becerra	Represented By Jose A Zelidon-Zepeda Caag - Office Of Attorney General contact info
Defendant State of California	Represented By Jose A Zelidon-Zepeda Caag - Office Of Attorney General contact info
Defendant John Doe
Plaintiff Lydia Olson	Represented By Theano Evangelis Kapur Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Dhananjay S Manthripragada Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Joshua S Lipshutz Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Brandon J Stoker Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Heather Lynn Richardson Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Blaine H Evanson Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info
Plaintiff Miguel Perez	Represented By Theano Evangelis Kapur Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Dhananjay S Manthripragada Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Joshua S Lipshutz Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Brandon J Stoker Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Heather Lynn Richardson Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Blaine H Evanson Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info
Plaintiff Postmates Inc.	Represented By Theano Evangelis Kapur Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Dhananjay S Manthripragada Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Joshua S Lipshutz Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Brandon J Stoker Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Heather Lynn Richardson Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Blaine H Evanson Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info
Plaintiff Uber Technologies, Inc.	Represented By Theano Evangelis Kapur Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Dhananjay S Manthripragada Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Joshua S Lipshutz Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Brandon J Stoker Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Heather Lynn Richardson Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info Blaine H Evanson Gibson Dunn And Crutcher LLP contact info
TERMINATED PARTIES
Amicus Keisha Broussard Terminated: 02/05/2020	Represented By Daniel T Rockey Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP contact info Thomas P Kinzinger Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP contact info Alexandra Costanza Whitworth Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP contact info
Amicus Raymond Frazier Terminated: 02/05/2020	Represented By Daniel T Rockey Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP contact info Thomas P Kinzinger Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP contact info Alexandra Costanza Whitworth Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP contact info
Amicus Daniel Rutka Terminated: 02/05/2020	Represented By Daniel T Rockey Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP contact info Thomas P Kinzinger Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP contact info Alexandra Costanza Whitworth Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP contact info
Amicus LaMar Wilder Terminated: 02/05/2020	Represented By Daniel T Rockey Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP contact info Thomas P Kinzinger Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP contact info Alexandra Costanza Whitworth Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP contact info

1.	Uber and Postmates claim gig worker bill AB-5 is unconstitutional in new lawsuit (social.techcrunch.com)
	Submitted Thu 01/02/2020

Docket last updated: 2 hours ago

Tuesday, July 02, 2024
110		110 1 pgs appeal USCA Mandate Fri 07/05 7:56 AM MANDATE of Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals,94 , CCA # 21-55757 The judgment of this Court, entered June 10, 2024, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. [See USCA Opinion,109 AFFIRMED.](mat) Related: [-]

Continue to Create Account