Gardner v. City of St. Louis et al
| Missouri Eastern District Court | |
| Judge: | John A Ross |
| Case #: | 4:20-cv-00060 |
| Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Cause | 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Case Filed: | Jan 13, 2020 |
| Terminated: | Sep 30, 2020 |
| Last checked: Saturday Jul 11, 2020 4:49 AM CDT |
|
Counter Claimant
Charles Lane
|
Represented By
|
|
Counter Defendant
Kimberly M. Gardner
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Gerard T. Carmody
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Patrick Carmody
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Ryann Carmody
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
City of St. Louis
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Charles Lane
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Jeffrey Roorda
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
St. Louis Police Officers' Association, Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 68
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Kimberly M. Gardner
|
Represented By
|
GPO
Sep 30 2020
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For these reasons,IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Charles A. Lanes (Lane) Motion to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint 43 is GRANTED and his Motion to Strike Pursuant to Rule 12(f) 45 is DENIED as moot.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Gerard Carmody, Patrick Carmody, and Ryann Carmody's Motion to Dismiss All Counts 48 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant City of St. Louiss Motion to Dismiss All Counts 50 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Police Officers' Association and Roorda's Motion to Dismiss Count I of the First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12 (b)(6) 54 is GRANTED and their Motion to Strike 54 is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Charles A. Lane's Motion to Strike Pursuant to Rule 12(f) 24 and Defendant City of St. Louis' Motion to Dismiss all Counts and Motion to Strike 34 are DENIED as moot. A separate judgment of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/30/20. (JAB) |
| Docket last updated: 6 hours ago |
| Wednesday, September 30, 2020 | ||
| 85 | 85
order
Judgment - (Case)
Wed 09/30 12:12 PM
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the Memorandum and Order filed this day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/30/20. (JAB) |
|
| 84 | 84
19
pgs
order
Memorandum & Order
Wed 09/30 12:07 PM
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For these reasons,IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Charles A. Lanes (Lane) Motion to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint43 is GRANTED and his Motion to Strike Pursuant to Rule 12(f)45 is DENIED as moot.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Gerard Carmody, Patrick Carmody, and Ryann Carmody's Motion to Dismiss All Counts48 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant City of St. Louiss Motion to Dismiss All Counts50 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Police Officers' Association and Roorda's Motion to Dismiss Count I of the First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12 (b)(6)54 is GRANTED and their Motion to Strike54 is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Charles A. Lane's Motion to Strike Pursuant to Rule 12(f)24 and Defendant City of St. Louis' Motion to Dismiss all Counts and Motion to Strike34 are DENIED as moot. A separate judgment of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/30/20. (JAB) |
|