CTA, et al v. Robert Bonta, et al
Original Case: 3:18-cv-02458
| Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals | |
| Case #: | 0:20-cv-55106 |
| Type | civil / private |
| Nature of Suit | 950 Other Statutes - Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| Case Filed: | Jan 30, 2020 |
| Terminated: | Apr 28, 2021 |
| Last checked: Saturday Feb 01, 2020 12:22 AM PST |
|
Defendant - Appellant
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of California
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellant
ANDRE SCHOORL, in his official capacity as the Acting Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellant
JULIE SU, in her official capacity as Secretary of the California Labor Workforce and Development Agency
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellant
PATRICK W. HENNING, in his official capacity as the Director of the Employment Development Department
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellant
LILIA GARCIA-BROWER, in her official capacity as Labor Commissioner of the State of California, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor-Defendant
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS
|
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
CALIFORNIA TRUCKING ASSOCIATION
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
RAVINDER SINGH
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
THOMAS ODOM
|
Represented By
|
GPO
Apr 28 2021
FILED OPINION (SANDRA S. IKUTA, MARK J. BENNETT and DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK) REVERSED. Judge: SSI Authoring, Judge: MJB Dissenting. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [12089354] [20-55106, 20-55107] |
| Docket last updated: 07/13/2022 3:11 AM PDT |
| Thursday, January 30, 2020 | ||
| 1 | 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: To be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal, C.R. 3-3. [11579177] (JBS) [Entered: 01/30/2020 09:22 AM] | |
|
Att: 1
1 pgs
Docketing Letter
|
||
|
Att: 2
2 pgs
Notice to All Parties and Counsel
|
||
|
Att: 3
1 pgs
Mediation Letter
|
||
|
Att: 4
22 pgs
Case Opening Packet
|
||
| 2 | 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Evan M. Tager (Mayer Brown LLP, 1999 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006) for Appellees California Trucking Association, Ravinder Singh and Thomas Odom. Date of service: 01/30/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11579742] 20-55106 (Tager, Evan) [Entered: 01/30/2020 01:40 PM] | |
| 3 | 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Andrew Tauber (Mayer Brown LLP, 1999 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006) for Appellees California Trucking Association, Ravinder Singh and Thomas Odom. Date of service: 01/30/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11579765] 20-55106 (Tauber, Andrew) [Entered: 01/30/2020 01:44 PM] | |
| 4 | 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Miriam R. Nemetz (Mayer Brown LLP, 1999 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006) for Appellees California Trucking Association, Ravinder Singh and Thomas Odom. Date of service: 01/30/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11579774] 20-55106 (Nemetz, Miriam) [Entered: 01/30/2020 01:48 PM] | |
| 5 | 5 Added Attorney(s) Andrew Tauber, Evan Mark Tager, Miriam R. Nemetz for party(s) Appellee Ravinder Singh Appellee Thomas Odom Appellee California Trucking Association, in case 20-55106 [11579794] (CW) [Entered: 01/30/2020 01:57 PM] | |
| 6 | 6
3
pgs
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): The court sua sponte consolidates appeal Nos. 20-55106 and 20-55107 The appeals, filed January 29, 2020, are preliminary injunction appeals. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaires are due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief(s) and excerpts of record are due not later than February 26, 2020; the consolidated answering brief is due March 25, 2020, or 28 days after service of the last-filed opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief(s) are due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). All parties on a side are encouraged to join in a single brief to the greatest extent practicable. See 9th Cir. R. 28-4. A review of this court’s docket reflects that the filing and docketing fees for appeal No. 20-55106 remain due. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay to the district court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal and file in this court proof of such payment. Failure to pay the fees or failure to timely file the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of the appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [11580087] 20-55106 20-55107 (AF) [Entered: 01/30/2020 04:13 PM]
|
|