Naveaux et al v. Monsanto Co.
Consolidated
Lead case: 3:16-md-02741
Lead case: 3:16-md-02741
California Northern District Court | |
Judge: | Vince Chhabria |
Case #: | 3:20-cv-02566 |
Nature of Suit | 365 Torts - Personal Injury - Product Liability |
Cause | 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Case Filed: | Apr 15, 2020 |
Case in other court: | Ohio Northern, 3:20-cv-00594 |
Last checked: Monday Oct 12, 2020 3:40 AM PDT |
Defendant
Monsanto Company
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
ELIZABETH NAVEAUX
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
THOMAS NAVEAUX
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 11 hours ago |
Friday, April 17, 2020 | ||
10 | 10
![]() Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company (Hollingsworth, Joe) |
|
9 | 9
![]() Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) |
|
8 | 8
![]() ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand byMonsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) |
|
Wednesday, April 15, 2020 | ||
7 | 7
![]() Case transferred in from District of Ohio Northern; Case Number 3:20-cv-00594. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
utility
MDL Member Case
Wed 04/15 11:17 AM
MEMBER CASE OPENED: Ohio Northern, 3:20-cv-00594, Naveaux et al v. Monsanto Co, Opened in California Northern District as 3:20-cv-02566-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 200 cc: JPMDL (fabS, COURT STAFF) |
||
Monday, April 13, 2020 | ||
6 | 6
![]() |
|
Monday, March 30, 2020 | ||
5 | 5
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Thursday, March 19, 2020 | ||
4 | 4
![]() |
|
3 | 3
![]() |
|
2 | 2
![]() |
|
1 | 1
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (K,AR) | ||
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (K,AR) | ||
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant. Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (K,AR) |