Stenulson v. ROI Solutions

Utah District Court
Judge:David Barlow
Referred: Jared C Bennett
Case #: 2:20-cv-00614
Nature of Suit710 Labor - Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause28:1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Case Filed:Sep 02, 2020
Terminated:Nov 03, 2022
Last checked: Wednesday Sep 07, 2022 6:14 AM MDT
Defendant
ROI Solutions
Represented By
Sean A. Monson
Parsons Behle & Latimer
contact info
Christina M. Jepson
Parsons Behle & Latimer
contact info
Eric U. Johnson
Parsons Behle & Latimer
contact info
Aaron M. Worthen
Parsons Behle & Latimer
contact info
Plaintiff
Veronica Stenulson
Represented By
Austin W. Anderson
Anderson Alexander PLLC
contact info
Lauren E. Braddy
Anderson Alexander, PLLC
contact info
Craig D. Henderson
Anderson Alexander PLLC
contact info
Clif Alexander
Anderson Alexander P.L.L.C.
contact info
W. Clifton Alexander
Anderson Alexander PLLC
contact info
Andrew W. Stavros
Stavros Law PC
contact info
Austin B. Egan
Stavros Law PC
contact info
Plaintiff
Merrill Lowe
Represented By
Austin W. Anderson
Anderson Alexander PLLC
contact info
Lauren E. Braddy
Anderson Alexander, PLLC
contact info
Craig D. Henderson
Anderson Alexander PLLC
contact info
Clif Alexander
Anderson Alexander P.L.L.C.
contact info
W. Clifton Alexander
Anderson Alexander PLLC
contact info
Andrew W. Stavros
Stavros Law PC
contact info

GPO Dec 28 2022
MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order granting 52 Motion for Leave to amend complaint. Ms. Stenulson shall file her amended complaint within seven days of the date of this Memorandum Decision and Order. The parties shall meet and confer to attempt to agree upon a proposed scheduling order. Within fourteen days of the date of this Memorandum Decision and Order, the parties shall file either a stipulated Attorney Planning Meeting Report and proposed scheduling order or an Attorney Planning Meeting Report outlining their respective positions on scheduling. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 12/28/2021. (jl)
GPO Feb 01 2022
MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order - the content of the notice and the consent form and the notice plan shall comply with the requirements outlined in the order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 02/01/2022. (jl)

Docket last updated: 03/12/2025 11:59 PM MDT
Thursday, November 03, 2022
order Order Thu 11/03 8:57 AM
DOCKET TEXT ORDER. On November 2, 2022, the parties filed their 151 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the stipulated dismissal with prejudice is self-effectuating. The case has been dismissed with prejudice per the terms of the stipulated dismissal, with no fees or costs awarded as to any party. No further order will follow. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 11/3/22. (skw)
Related: [-]
utility Terminate Civil Case Thu 11/03 11:14 AM
Civil Case Terminated. Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett no longer assigned to case. Case closed (mh)
Related: [-]
Wednesday, November 02, 2022
151 151 misc Stipulation of Dismissal (Atty) Wed 11/02 10:07 AM
STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by Veronica Stenulson. (Alexander, W.)
Related: [-]
Tuesday, November 01, 2022
order Order Tue 11/01 1:06 PM
DOCKET TEXT ORDER. On September 30, 2022, Plaintiffs filed 143 Motion for Approval of FLSA Settlement. On October 11, 2022, the court entered an order approving Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Approval of FLSA Settlement. ECF No. 149. That same day, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Errata, submitting additional exhibits to the Motion for Approval. ECF No. 148. One of the exhibits was a proposed order that both approved the settlement and dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice. However, the 143 Motion for Approval had not requested the court dismiss the case. Therefore, the court requests the parties file a motion to dismiss with prejudice within 14 days. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 11/1/22. (skw)
Related: [-]