Ratliff v. Google LLC et al
Consolidated
Lead case: 3:21-md-02981
Lead case: 3:21-md-02981
| California Northern District Court | |
| Judge: | James Donato |
| Case #: | 3:21-cv-01284 |
| Nature of Suit | 410 Other Statutes - Antitrust |
| Cause | 15:2 Antitrust Litigation |
| Case Filed: | Feb 23, 2021 |
| Case in other court: | Mississippi Southern, 3:20-cv-00833 |
| Last checked: Sunday Aug 22, 2021 1:23 AM PDT |
|
Defendant
Alphabet Inc.
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Google LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Christopher Bryan Ratliff , II
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 03/31/2025 11:59 PM PDT |
| Wednesday, November 03, 2021 | ||
| 13 | 13
notice
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
Wed 11/03 12:05 PM
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Christopher Bryan Ratliff, II (Tostrud, Jon) |
|
| 12 | 12
notice
Notice of Appearance
Wed 11/03 11:46 AM
NOTICE of Appearance by Jon A. Tostrud (Tostrud, Jon) |
|
| Tuesday, February 23, 2021 | ||
| 11 | 11
transfer
Case Transferred In - District Transfer
Tue 02/23 3:03 PM
Case transferred in from District of Mississippi Southern; Case Number 3:20-cv-00833. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
|
utility
MDL Member Case
Tue 02/23 3:18 PM
MEMBER CASE OPENED MDL 2981: Southern District of Mississippi (Northern (Jackson)), 3:20-cv-00833-DPJ-FKB, Ratliff v. Google LLC et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:21-cv-01284-JD pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 1 cc: JPMDL (elyS, COURT STAFF) |
||
| Wednesday, February 17, 2021 | ||
| 10 | 10
CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER: transferring this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. (PG)
|
|
| 9 | 9
COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER: Transferring case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. (PG)
|
|
| Friday, January 22, 2021 | ||
| ***ERROR***DISREGARD***ERROR***TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Alphabet Inc. answer due 2/18/2021; Google LLC answer due 2/18/2021. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 1/22/2021. (dcw) Modified on 1/22/2021 (dcw). | ||
| TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants' deadline to serve responses to the Complaint1 will be held in abeyance until the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issues an Order regarding the centralization of similar claims. At such time as that Order issues, Defendants will then have 21 days to serve responses. Defendants will be responsible for notifying all parties when such an Order has issued from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, and if an Order has not issued by 2/18/2021, Defendants shall so notify this Court via electronic mail. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 1/22/2021. (dcw) | ||
| Thursday, January 21, 2021 | ||
| 8 | 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Chelsea C. Lewis on behalf of Alphabet Inc., Google LLC (Lewis, Chelsea)
|
|
| 7 | 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel J. Mulholland on behalf of Alphabet Inc., Google LLC (Mulholland, Daniel)
|
|
| 6 | 6
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re1 Complaint by Alphabet Inc., Google LLC (Krutz, Fred)
|
|
| Tuesday, January 19, 2021 | ||
| 5 | 5
NOTICE of Appearance by John W. Barrett on behalf of Christopher Bryan Ratliff, II (Barrett, John)
|
|
| Wednesday, December 30, 2020 | ||
| 4 | 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher Bryan Ratliff, II. (Riley, Katherine)
|
|
| 3 | 3
***ERROR***DISREGARD THIS ENTRY. SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher Bryan Ratliff, II. Alphabet Inc. served on 12/30/2020, answer due 1/20/2021; Google LLC served on 12/30/2020, answer due 1/20/2021. (Riley, Katherine) Modified on 12/30/2020 (cwl).
|
|
| 2 | 2
Summons Issued as to Alphabet Inc., Google LLC. (PG)
|
|
| 1 | 1
COMPLAINT against Alphabet Inc., Google LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0538-4448106), filed by Christopher Bryan Ratliff, II.(PG)
|
|
|
Att: 1
Civil Cover Sheet
|
||
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #3 : A return on summons should not be filed without the first page, as issued, preceding the return. Attorney is directed to refile. (cwl) | ||