California Central District Court
Judge:Consuelo B Marshall
Referred: John E Mcdermott
Case #: 2:21-cv-01803
Nature of Suit850 Other Statutes - Securities/Commodities/Exchange
Cause15:77 Securities Fraud
Case Filed:Feb 25, 2021
Terminated:Sep 17, 2021
Last checked: Tuesday Aug 24, 2021 2:28 AM PDT
Defendant
Axonic Credit Opportunities Master Fund, LP
Represented By
Bernard Robert Given, II
Loeb And Loeb LLP
contact info
Defendant
Patrick Nelson
Represented By
Matthew I Kaplan
Tucker Ellis LLP
contact info
John Q. Lewis
Tucker Ellis LLP
contact info
Defendant
Nelson Partners, LLC
Represented By
Matthew I Kaplan
Tucker Ellis LLP
contact info
John Q. Lewis
Tucker Ellis LLP
contact info
Defendant
ACO Skyloft Manager, LLC
Represented By
Bernard Robert Given, II
Loeb And Loeb LLP
contact info
Defendant
AxSPV LLC Series ACO CRE Lender
Represented By
Bernard Robert Given, II
Loeb And Loeb LLP
contact info
Defendant
AxSPV LLC Series NB CRE Lender
Represented By
Bernard Robert Given, II
Loeb And Loeb LLP
contact info
Defendant
AxSPV LLC Series SBL CRE Lender
Represented By
Bernard Robert Given, II
Loeb And Loeb LLP
contact info
Defendant
Axonic Capital LLC
Represented By
Bernard Robert Given, II
Loeb And Loeb LLP
contact info
Defendant
Clayton Degiancinto
Represented By
Bernard Robert Given, II
Loeb And Loeb LLP
contact info
Defendant
Does
Defendant
NP Skyloft JV, LLC
Represented By
Matthew I Kaplan
Tucker Ellis LLP
contact info
Bernard Robert Given, II
Loeb And Loeb LLP
contact info
Defendant
NP Skyloft St, LLC
Represented By
John Gerard Burgee
Burgee And Abramoff
contact info
Matthew I Kaplan
Tucker Ellis LLP
contact info
Plaintiff
Sandra Parziale
Represented By
Ryan T Hansen
Brownlie Hansen LLP
contact info
Robert W Brownlie
Brownlie Hansen LLP
contact info


Docket last updated: 03/31/2025 11:59 PM PDT
Wednesday, July 13, 2022
53 53 appeal USCA Memorandum/Opinion/Order Wed 07/13 2:13 PM
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals49 filed by Sandra Parziale. CCA # 21-56084 Pursuant to the Parties Stipulation of Dismissal, Dkt. No. 32, the appeal is DISMISSED. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order constitutes the mandate of this court. (shb)
Related: [-]