Paxton et al v. Richardson
| Texas Northern District Court | |
| Judge: | Mark Pittman |
| Case #: | 4:22-cv-00143 |
| Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Cause | 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| Case Filed: | Feb 24, 2022 |
| Terminated: | Jul 18, 2023 |
| Last checked: Tuesday Aug 23, 2022 4:10 AM CDT |
|
Defendant
Merrick B Garland
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Gary M. Restaino
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Floice Allen
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Tracy Martin
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Ken Paxton
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
David Schnitz
|
Represented By
|
| TERMINATED PARTIES | |
|
Defendant
Marvin Richardson
Terminated: 05/17/2022
|
Represented By
|
GPO
Jul 18 2023
OPINION & ORDER: Therefore, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 53) and DENIES Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 49). The Court further ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 7/18/2023) (saw) |
| Docket last updated: 2 hours ago |
| Tuesday, August 13, 2024 | ||
| 70 | 70
appeal
USCA Opinion
Tue 08/13 4:16 PM
Opinion of USCA No. 23-10802 in accordance with USCA judgment re66 Notice of Appeal, filed by Ken Paxton. We AFFIRM. (tle) |
|
| 69 | 69
appeal
USCA Judgment/Mandate
Tue 08/13 4:14 PM
JUDGMENT/MANDATE of USCA No. 23-10802 as to66 Notice of Appeal, filed by Ken Paxton. IT IS ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED. Issued as Mandate: 8/13/2024. (tle) |
|
|
Att: 1
USCA5 Cover Letter
|
||