Hartman et al v. Santa Clara County et al
California Northern District Court | |
Judge: | Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
Referred: | Kandis A Westmore |
Case #: | 4:22-cv-01591 |
Nature of Suit | 442 Civil Rights - Employment |
Cause | 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Case Filed: | Mar 14, 2022 |
Last checked: Saturday Sep 10, 2022 2:52 AM PDT |
Defendant
Dr. David Jacobson
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Paul E. Lorenz
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Santa Clara County
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Jeffrey V. Smith
|
Represented By
|
Evaluator
Simon Frankel
Covington & Burling LLP Salesforce Tower 415 Mission Street
San Francisco, CA 94105 |
|
Plaintiff
Shannon Hartman
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Dr. Katie Lightfoot
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 10 hours ago |
Wednesday, May 10, 2023 | ||
69 | 69
oth_evt
Clerks Notice ADI
Wed 05/10 3:39 PM
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to the Honorable Araceli Martinez-Olguin in the San Francisco division for all further proceedings. 1. All future filings shall bear the initials AMO immediately after the case number. 2. All case management conference dates are vacated and will be reset by the Court. 3. All hearing dates presently scheduled are VACATED. However, existing briefing schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be RENOTICED for hearing before Judge Martinez-Olguin by the moving party for a date consistent with the Courts law and motion calendar, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior briefing schedule. 4. Deadlines for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff remain unchanged. 5. All pretrial conference and trial dates currently set after August 18, 2023, and all other deadlines associated with the case, will remain in place unless otherwise ordered. 6. All pretrial conference and trial dates scheduled on or before August 18, 2023, are vacated. Other pretrial deadlines (e.g., motions in limine, pretrial statements, proposed joint trial exhibits, etc.) will remain in place. The Court will notify the parties when a status conference will be held to schedule a new pretrial conference and trial dates for affected cases. 7. Matters currently referred to a Magistrate Judge will remain before that Magistrate Judge absent further notice. 8. On or before May 31, 2023, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement (separate statements are appropriate if either party is proceeding without counsel). The statement should not exceed ten pages in length and should address all issues outlined in the [LINK:Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District] . The approved form for such statements can be accessed [LINK:here] . A Joint Case Management Statement is not required in prisoner cases in which the prisoner plaintiff/petitioner is not represented by counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 5/10/2023 FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Mark B. Busby, Clerk of Court (ecg-adi, COURT STAFF) |
|
Friday, May 05, 2023 | ||
68 | 68
oth_sup
Statement of Non-Opposition
Fri 05/05 9:29 AM
Statement of Non-Opposition re66 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint filed byDavid Jacobson, Paul E. Lorenz, Santa Clara County, Jeffrey V. Smith. (Nguyen, William) |
|
Wednesday, May 03, 2023 | ||
67 | 67
1
pgs
order
Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge for Discovery
Wed 05/03 10:24 AM
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/3/2023. (eac, COURT STAFF) |
|
utility
Case Referred to Magistrate Judge for Discovery
Wed 05/03 3:32 PM
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore for Discovery (mkl, COURT STAFF) |