D.C. Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
Case #: 0:14-rev-01168
Typepetition for review / review
Case Filed:Sep 05, 2014
Terminated:Dec 18, 2015
Last checked: Wednesday Nov 16, 2016 1:51 PM EST
Petitioner
Flytenow, Inc.
Represented By
Clint Bolick
Goldwater Institute
contact info
Jonathan Riches
Goldwater Institute
contact info
Gregory Sean Winton
The Aviation Law Firm
contact info
Aditya Dynar
Goldwater Institute
contact info
Respondent
Federal Aviation Administration, Administrator
Represented By
Benjamin Charles Mizer
U.S. Department of Justice
contact info
Ronald C. Machen Jr.
U.S. Attorney's Office
contact info
Sydney A. Foster
U.S. Department of Justice
contact info
Mark Reiling Freeman
U.S. Department of Justice
contact info

GPO Dec 18 2015
OPINION [1589331] filed (Pages: 23) for the Court by Judge Pillard. [14-1168]

1. Ride-Sharing for Pilots Is No Flight of Fancy (wsj.com)
Submitted Wed 11/16/2016
2. U.S. Court of Appeals Takes on Ridesharing in Aviation (blog.flytenow.com)
Submitted Tue 09/29/2015
3. Plane-Sharing Startup Sues FAA Over Ban on Service (wsj.com)
Submitted Thu 01/08/2015
Docket last updated: 11/16/2016 1:51 PM EST
Friday, September 05, 2014
PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. 14-1168
Related: [-]
PETITION FOR REVIEW filed [1511077] by Flytenow, Inc. of a decision by federal agency [Service Date: 09/05/2014 ] Disclosure Statement: Not Applicable to this Party; Certificate of Parties: Not Applicable to this Filing. 14-1168
Related: [-]