SI v. BED BATH & BEYOND CORPORATION et al
District Of Columbia District Court | |
Judge: | Trevor N Mcfadden |
Case #: | 1:22-cv-02541 |
Nature of Suit | 850 Other Statutes - Securities/Commodities/Exchange |
Cause | 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Case Filed: | Aug 23, 2022 |
Last checked: Sunday Feb 19, 2023 4:03 AM EST |
Defendant
RYAN COHEN
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
RC VENTURES LLC
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
BED BATH & BEYOND CORPORATION
650 Liberty Avenue
Union, NJ 07083 |
Represented By
|
Defendant
Sue E. Gove
|
|
Movant
ALLEN GALLEGLY
|
Represented By
|
Movant
BRATYA SPRL
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
PENGCHENG SI
|
Represented By
|
TERMINATED PARTIES | |
Defendant
ARNAL GUSTAVO
Terminated: 11/02/2022
|
|
Defendant
JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC
Terminated: 01/30/2023
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 04/17/2025 11:59 PM EDT |
Thursday, April 03, 2025 | ||
142 | 142
![]() RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by BRATYA SPRL. (Jafri, Omar) |
|
order
.Order ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines
Thu 04/03 7:55 AM
MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The parties were directed to submit a joint proposed schedule for further proceedings within 14 days of the Court's ruling on the133 Motion for Reconsideration or adjudication of a Rule 23(f) appeal, whichever came later. See Minute Order 10/17/2024. It has been 28 days since entry of the Court's ruling on the Motion for Reconsideration. See141 Memorandum Order. And Plaintiff has not docketed a notice of a Rule 23(f) appeal. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall, by April 17, 2025, SHOW CAUSE as to why the claims against Defendant should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of this action, without further notice. See LCvR 83.23. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 04/03/2025. (lctnm3) |