Wang v. API Technologies Corporation
| Massachusetts District Court | |
| Judge: | Patti B Saris |
| Referred: | Paul G Levenson |
| Case #: | 1:22-cv-12002 |
| Nature of Suit | 442 Civil Rights - Employment |
| Cause | 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Case Filed: | Nov 22, 2022 |
| Last checked: Sunday May 21, 2023 6:02 AM EDT |
|
Defendant
API Technologies Corporation
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Weixing V. Wang
71 Vanderland Ave
East Providence, RI 02914 |
GPO
May 30 2023
Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley: ORDER entered. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Recommendation: For the reasons set out above, the court recommends that defendants Motion for a More Definite Statement and to Dismiss Plaintiffs Age Discrimination Claim, see 9, and that plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions, see 13, be denied. Objections to R&R due by 6/13/2023. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
|
|
GPO
Jun 22 2023
Judge Patti B. Saris: ENDORSED ORDER entered on Report and Recommendation Docket No. 24. " I adopt the Report and Recommendation without objection and deny all motions." (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde) |
|
|
GPO
Nov 13 2023
Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above, plaintiff's Motion to Compel Disclosure and For Appropriate Sanctions to Defendant is allowed to the extent that it seeks (i) "the name and, if known, the address and telephone number" of the former Quality Manager and the 2019 Quality Manager," and (ii) all "notes, emails, memorandums and writings" relating to the 2019 Quality Manager's applications and interviews. Defendant shall produce all discovery ordered by no later than November 17, 2023. Plaintiff's motion, including his request for sanctions and fees, is otherwise DENIED. Please see attached order. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
|
|
GPO
Mar 26 2024
Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley: ORDER entered. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 95 MOTION for Default Judgment as to API Technology filed by Weixing Vincent Wang Recommendation: For the reasons stated above, the court recommends that plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment 95 be denied. Objections to R&R due by 4/9/2024(Vieira, Leonardo) |
|
|
GPO
Apr 10 2024
Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. ORDER on 96 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 95 MOTION for Default Judgment. " The Court Adopts the Recommendation and Denied the Motion for Default Judgment." (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde) |