Indiana Southern District Court
Judge:Tanya Walton Pratt
Referred: Tim A Baker
Case #: 1:23-cv-00001
Nature of Suit440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights
Cause42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Case Filed:Jan 01, 2023
Terminated:Aug 24, 2023
Last checked: Saturday Jul 01, 2023 7:30 AM EDT
Defendant
DAVE BURTNER
Represented By
Chou-il Lee
Taft Stettinius & Hollister Llp (indianapolis)
contact info
Beth Ann Copeland
Taft Stettinius & Hollister
contact info
Defendant
MIKE FIELD
Represented By
Chou-il Lee
Taft Stettinius & Hollister Llp (indianapolis)
contact info
Beth Ann Copeland
Taft Stettinius & Hollister
contact info
Defendant
CALEB GUTSCHALL
Represented By
Chou-il Lee
Taft Stettinius & Hollister Llp (indianapolis)
contact info
Beth Ann Copeland
Taft Stettinius & Hollister
contact info
Defendant
JIM HANLON
Represented By
Chou-il Lee
Taft Stettinius & Hollister Llp (indianapolis)
contact info
Beth Ann Copeland
Taft Stettinius & Hollister
contact info
Defendant
DAN MAC INNIS
Represented By
Chou-il Lee
Taft Stettinius & Hollister Llp (indianapolis)
contact info
Beth Ann Copeland
Taft Stettinius & Hollister
contact info
Defendant
LAUREN WAHL
Represented By
Chou-il Lee
Taft Stettinius & Hollister Llp (indianapolis)
contact info
Beth Ann Copeland
Taft Stettinius & Hollister
contact info
Plaintiff
SABINE KISSEE
Represented By
Silvia B. Miller
Allen Wellman Mcnew Harvey LLP
contact info
Jay Meisenhelder
Jay Meisenhelder Employment & Civil Rights Legal Services PC
contact info
Michael C. Cooley
Allen Wellman Mcnew Harvey
contact info
Plaintiff
MIB, LLC
Represented By
Silvia B. Miller
Allen Wellman Mcnew Harvey LLP
contact info
Jay Meisenhelder
Jay Meisenhelder Employment & Civil Rights Legal Services PC
contact info
Michael C. Cooley
Allen Wellman Mcnew Harvey
contact info
Plaintiff
RYAN POLOKOFF
Represented By
Silvia B. Miller
Allen Wellman Mcnew Harvey LLP
contact info
Jay Meisenhelder
Jay Meisenhelder Employment & Civil Rights Legal Services PC
contact info
Michael C. Cooley
Allen Wellman Mcnew Harvey
contact info

GPO Aug 24 2023
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, PLAINTIFFS' VERIFIED MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE, EX PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY: The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 49). Because amendment cannot cure the fact that Plaintiffs' claims are barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion, Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with prejudice. The Court further DENIES as moot Plaintiffs' Verified Motion for Immediate, Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order ( Filing No. 32) and Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony at September 6 Hearing (Filing No. 57). The hearing on Plaintiffs' Verified Motion for Immediate, Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order is hereby VACATED, and final judgment will issue under separate order. See Order. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/24/2023. (LF)

Create an account to get the full docket for this case.