Mark McDonald, et al v. Kristina Lawson, et al
Original Case: 8:22-cv-01805
| Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals | |
| Case #: | 0:22-cv-56220 |
| Type | civil / private |
| Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Case Filed: | Dec 30, 2022 |
| Terminated: | Feb 29, 2024 |
| Last checked: Monday Mar 04, 2024 1:26 AM PST |
|
Amicus Curiae
NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
ACLU FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
COMPASSION & CHOICES
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellee
RICHARD E. THORP
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellee
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity at Attorney General of California
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellee
ESERICK WATKINS, in their official capacities as members of the Medical Board of California
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellee
VELING TSAI
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellee
NICOLE A. JEONG
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellee
ASIF MAHMOOD
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellee
JAMES M. HEALZER
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellee
RYAN BROOKS
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellee
DAVID E. RYU
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellee
MICHELLE ANNE BHOLAT
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellee
LAURIE ROSE LUBIANO, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Medical Board of California
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellee
RANDY W. HAWKINS, in his official capacity as Vice President of the Medical Board of California
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellee
KRISTINA D. LAWSON, in her official capacity as President of the Medical Board of California
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor - Pending
LETRINH HOANG, D.O.
|
|
|
Intervenor - Pending
PHYSICIANS FOR INFORMED CONSENT, a not for-profit organization
|
|
|
Intervenor - Pending
CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE, CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, a California Nonprofit Corporation
|
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
MARK MCDONALD
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
JEFF BARKE
|
Represented By
|
GPO
Feb 29 2024
FILED OPINION (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, DANIELLE J. FORREST and KATHLEEN CARDONE) VACATED AND REMANDED. Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal. Judge: DJF Authoring. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [12864123] [22-56220, 23-55069] |
| Docket last updated: 03/04/2024 12:56 AM PST |
| Friday, December 30, 2022 | ||
| 1 | 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: to be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal. C.R. 3-3. [12620320] (RT) [Entered: 12/30/2022 09:33 AM] | |
|
Att: 1
1 pgs
Docketing Letter
|
||
|
Att: 2
2 pgs
Notice to All Parties and Counsel
|
||
|
Att: 3
1 pgs
Mediation Letter
|
||
|
Att: 4
2 pgs
Mediation Questionnaire
|
||
|
Att: 5
22 pgs
Case Opening Packet
|
||
| 2 | 2
2
pgs
Filed (ECF) Appellants Jeff Barke and Mark McDonald Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/30/2022. [12620416] 22-56220 (Stephens, Reilly) [Entered: 12/30/2022 10:59 AM]
|
|
| 3 | 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/30/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following link. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12620522]. 22-56220 (AD) [Entered: 12/30/2022 12:44 PM] | |
| 4 | 4
2
pgs
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SH): The appeal filed December 29, 2022 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due no later than January 26, 2023; the answering brief is due February 23, 2023 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [12620813] (AF) [Entered: 12/30/2022 04:18 PM]
|
|