Stevenson v. Thornburgh et al
| New York Southern District Court | |
| Judge: | Colleen Mcmahon |
| Case #: | 1:23-cv-04458 |
| Nature of Suit | 160 Contract - Stockholders’ Suits |
| Cause | 28:1331ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Case Filed: | May 28, 2023 |
| Terminated: | May 29, 2024 |
| Last checked: Friday Nov 24, 2023 3:44 AM EST |
|
Amicus
Better Markets, Inc.
2000 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 4008
Washington, DC 20006 |
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
James L Amine
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Regina H Mayor
|
|
|
Defendant
David Middendorf
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
David L Miller
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Kaikhushru S Nargolwala
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Laura M Newinski
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Timothy P O'Hara
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
John G Popp
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Joaquin J Ribeiro
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Urs Rohner
|
|
|
Defendant
Severin Schwan
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Albert Sohn
|
|
|
Defendant
Brian J Sweet
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
William Thomas
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Pamela A Thomas-Graham
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Richard E Thornburgh
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
John Tiner
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Eric Varvel
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Philip Vasan
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
John B Veihmeyer
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Jeffrey Wada
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Lara J Warner
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Thomas Whittle
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Robert S Shafir
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Bradley W Dougan
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Mirko Bianchi
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Iris Bohnet
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Larry Bradley
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Sean T Brady
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
David Britt
|
|
|
Defendant
Romeo Cerutti
|
|
|
Defendant
Brian Chin
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Credit Suisse Capital LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Credit Suisse Holdings (USA) Inc.
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Credit Suisse Management LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
David R Mathers
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Noreen Doyle
|
|
|
Defendant
Cynthia Holder
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Lydie Hudson
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Robert Jain
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
KPMG LLC
|
|
|
Defendant
KPMG LLP
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Jay Kim
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Michael Klein
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Paul Knopp
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Seraina Macia
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Scott Marcello
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Gregory A Stevenson
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 03/07/2025 11:59 PM EST |
| Wednesday, November 06, 2024 | ||
| 147 | 147
order
Stipulation and Order
Wed 11/06 12:42 PM
STIPULATION AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among Lead Plaintiff Ali Diabat ("Plaintiff') and Defendants Credit Suisse Group AG, Axel P. Lehmann, Ulrich Korner, and Dixit Joshi (collectively, "Defendants," and, with Plaintiff, each a " Party"), by and through their undersigned counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c): 1. The Parties anticipate that discovery in this action is likely to involve the production of confidential, proprietary, and private information for which special protection from publicdisclosure and from use for any purpose other than in connection with this action may be warranted. As such, any Party or non-party that produces documents or other information in this action (each a "Producing Party") may designate as "Confidential" any "Discovery Material" (i.e., information of any kind provided in discovery in this action) subject to the terms of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order (the "Stipulation and Order"). Any Party that receives Confidential Discovery Material from any Producing Party in this action (each a "Receiving Party") shall not disclose such Confidential Discovery Material to anyone else except as expressly permitted hereunder. P.S: I do not believe that much of anything in this case is likely to be deemed "confidential" in the first analysis - this is a securities fraud case, not a trade secrets case - so do not be too liberal in your designation of "confidential" material. (And as further set forth herein.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 11/1/2024) (jca) |
|