USA v. Ridenour
| Arizona District Court | |
| Case #: | 4:23-cr-00908 |
| Case Filed: | Jun 22, 2023 |
| Last checked: Saturday Jun 24, 2023 12:32 AM MST |
|
Defendant
Eric Ridenour (1)
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
USA
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 06/24/2023 1:02 AM MST |
| Monday, May 22, 2023 | ||
| Arrest of Eric Ridenour on 5/22/2023. (REC) [4:23-mj-01853-N/A-LCK] | ||
| Wednesday, May 24, 2023 | ||
| 1 | 1
COMPLAINT as to Eric Ridenour. (REC) [4:23-mj-01853-N/A-LCK]
|
|
| Thursday, May 25, 2023 | ||
| 2 | 2 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald: Initial Appearance as to Eric Ridenour held on 5/25/2023. FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT TAKEN. Appointing Nancy Janeth Arce for Eric Ridenour with Appointment Type: FPD. Defendant(s) state true name to be the same. Government's motion for detention and request for continuance of the Detention Hearing is granted. Defendant(s) temporarily detained in the custody of the U.S. Marshal. Interpreter N/A English. Defendant did not interview with PTS. PTS request for an extra day is granted. In the presence of government and defense counsel, the Court orally advises the government of their Brady obligation. Written order to follow. Appearances : AUSA Rui Wang, specially appearing for the Government, AFPD Nancy Arce for Defendant. Defendant is present and in custody. Detention Hearing set for 5/31/2023 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera. Preliminary Hearing set for 5/31/2023 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera. Hearing held 2:25 pm to 3:10 pm. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BHA) [4:23-mj-01853-N/A-LCK] | |
| 3 | 3 ORDER: Under federal law, including Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and all applicable decisions from the Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit interpreting Brady , the government has a continuing obligation to produce all information or evidence known to the government relating to guilt or punishment that might reasonably be considered favorable to the defendant's case, even if the evidence is not admissible so long as it is reasonably likely to lead to admissible evidence. See United States v. Price , 566 F.3d 900,913 n.14 (9th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, the court orders the government to produce to the defendant in a timely manner all such information or evidence. Information or evidence may be favorable to a defendant's case if it either may help bolster the defendant's case or impeach a prosecutor's witness or other government evidence. If doubt exists, it should be resolved in favor of the defendant with full disclosure being made. If the government believes that a required disclosure would compromise witness safety, victim rights, national security, a sensitive law-enforcement technique, or any other substantial government interest, the government may apply to the Court for a modification of the requirements of this Disclosure Order, which may include in camera review and/or withholding or subjecting to a protective order all or part of the information. This Disclosure Order is entered under Rule 5(f) and does not relieve any party in this matter of any other discovery obligation. The consequences for violating either this Disclosure Order or the government's obligations under Brady include, but are not limited to, the following: contempt, sanction, referral to a disciplinary authority, adverse jury instruction, exclusion of evidence, and dismissal of charges. Nothing in this Disclosure Order enlarges or diminishes the government's obligation to disclose information and evidence to a defendant under Brady , as interpreted and applied under Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit precedent. As the Supreme Court noted, "the government violates the Constitution's Due Process Clause 'if it withholds evidence that is favorable to the defense and material to the defendant's guilt or punishment." ' Turner v. United States , 137 S. Ct. 1885, 1888 (2017), quoting Smith v. Cain , 565 U.S. 73, 75 (2012). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald.(BHA)(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) [4:23-mj-01853-N/A-LCK] | |
| 4 | 4
SEALED CJA 23 Financial Affidavit by Eric Ridenour. (BHA) [4:23-mj-01853-N/A-LCK]
|
|
| Wednesday, May 31, 2023 | ||
| 7 | 7 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera: Preliminary Hearing as to Eric Ridenour waived on 5/31/2023. Finding: Defendant held to answer before District Court. Status Conference re: Detention held. The Court notes the Pretrial Services addendum indicates that defendant refused to be interviewed by Pretrial Services a second time. Defense counsel assures the Court that defendant is willing to be interviewed and moves to continue the Detention Hearing. The Government informs the Court it is requesting a dangerousness hearing. The Court sets the matter for a Detention Hearing re: Dangerousness as indicated below. Appearances : AUSA Adam Rossi for the Government, AFPD Nancy Arce for defendant. Defendant is present and in custody. Detention Hearing re: Dangerousness set for 6/7/2023 at 03:30 PM in Special Proceedings Courtroom, 2nd Floor, 405 West Congress Street, Tucson, AZ 85701 before Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera. Hearing held 10:33 AM to 11:07 AM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SIB) [4:23-mj-01853-N/A-LCK] | |
| Monday, June 05, 2023 | ||
| 8 | 8
NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Matei Tarail appearing for Eric Ridenour (Co-Counsel) . (Tarail, Matei) [4:23-mj-01853-N/A-LCK]
|
|
| Tuesday, June 06, 2023 | ||
| 9 | 9
First MOTION to Continue Detention Hearing by Eric Ridenour. (Arce, Nancy) [4:23-mj-01853-N/A-LCK]
|
|
| 10 | 10 ORDER granting9 Motion to Continue Detention/Dangerousness Hearing as to Eric Ridenour (1). Detention/Dangerousness Hearing RESET to 6/15/2023 at 02:50 PM in Courtroom 5F, 405 West Congress Street, Tucson, AZ 85701 before Magistrate Judge Lynnette C Kimmins. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lynnette C Kimmins. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.)(NB) [4:23-mj-01853-N/A-LCK] | |
| Wednesday, June 07, 2023 | ||
| 11 | 11
NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Benjamin Goldberg appearing for USA . (Goldberg, Benjamin) [4:23-mj-01853-N/A-LCK]
|
|
| Wednesday, June 14, 2023 | ||
| 12 | 12
8
pgs
MEMORANDUM by USA as to Eric Ridenour for Detention Hearing . (Rossi, Adam) [4:23-mj-01853-N/A-LCK]
|
|
| Thursday, June 15, 2023 | ||
| 13 | 13
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Lynnette C Kimmins: Detention Hearing as to Eric Ridenour held on 6/15/2023. Defendant ordered/continued detained pending trial as a danger. Hearing held 3:08 pm to 5:01 pm.(CKS) [4:23-mj-01853-N/A-LCK]
|
|
| 14 | 14
WITNESS LIST by USA as to Eric Ridenour. (CKS) [4:23-mj-01853-N/A-LCK]
|
|
| 15 | 15
EXHIBIT LIST by USA as to Eric Ridenour. (CKS) [4:23-mj-01853-N/A-LCK]
|
|
| 16 | 16
Amended by Doc. 17, ORDER OF DETENTION as to Eric Ridenour. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lynnette C Kimmins on 6/15/2023.(CKS) Modified on 6/16/2023 (CKS). [4:23-mj-01853-N/A-LCK]
|
|
| Friday, June 16, 2023 | ||
| 17 | 17
AMENDED ORDER OF DETENTION as to Eric Ridenour. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lynnette C Kimmins on 6/16/2023.(CKS) [4:23-mj-01853-N/A-LCK]
|
|
| Thursday, June 22, 2023 | ||
| 19 | 19
INDICTMENT as to Eric Ridenour (1) count(s) 1-2. Arraignment set for 7/14/2023 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M Rateau. Counsel to advise defendants wishing to waive their appearance at the Arraignment Hearing of the following dates: Trial: 8/22/2023; Plea Deadline: 8/4/2023.
NOTE: The process for waiving defendant's appearance at Arraignment has changed. There is no longer a need to file a Notice of Intent to File Waiver of Defendants Appearance. Instead, signed appearance waivers may be electronically filed using the Waiver of Defendants Presence at Arraignment and Acknowledgement of Trial Date event. The event is located under Criminal Event Categories: Other Filings/Waivers. The signed Waiver must be filed no later than 12:00 PM the business day prior to the scheduled arraignment.
Failure of defense counsel to file a timely waiver (or a timely motion to continue) may result in the reappointment of defense counsel. (MCO)
|
|
| 21 | 21
SEALED UNREDACTED INDICTMENT as to Eric Ridenour. (KAH)
|
|