In Re: FTX Cryptocurrency Exchange Collapse Litigation
Consolidated
Lead case: 1:22-cv-23817
Lead case: 1:22-cv-23817
| Florida Southern District Court | |
| Judge: | K Michael Moore |
| Referred: | Eduardo I Sanchez |
| Case #: | 1:23-md-03076 |
| Nature of Suit | 370 Torts - Personal Property - Other Fraud |
| Cause | 28:1407 Multidistrict Litigation |
| Case Filed: | Jun 05, 2023 |
| Case in other court: | 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Miami Dade County, 23-19621-CA 01 |
| Last checked: Monday Aug 28, 2023 12:20 PM EDT |
|
Consol Defendant
Prager Metis CPAs, LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Altimeter Capital Management, LP
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Armanino, LLP
414 Montgomery St Suite 900
San Francisco, CA 94104 |
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Ben Armstrong
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Samuel Bankman-Fried
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Thomas Brady
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Gisele Bundchen
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Jean Chalopin
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Creators Agency, LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Stephen Curry
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Deltec Bank and Trust Company Limited
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Caroline Ellison
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Farmington State Bank
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Fenwick & West LLP
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Dan Friedberg
|
|
|
Consol Defendant
Golden State Warriors LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Udonis Haslem
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Andrei Jikh
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Brian Jung
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
K5 Global Advisor LLC
|
|
|
Consol Defendant
Erika Kullberg
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
William Trevor Lawrence
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Jeremy Lefebvre
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
David Gene Lewis
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Multicoin Capital Management LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Tom Nash
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Kevin O'Leary
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Shaquille O'Neal
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Shohei Ohtani
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
David Ortiz
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Naomi Osaka
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Kevin Paffrath
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Paradigm Operations LP
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Ribbit Capital, L.P.
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Sequoia Capital Operations LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Signature Bank
|
|
|
Consol Defendant
Silvergate Bank
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Jaspreet Singh
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Nishad Singh
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Sino Global Capital Limited
|
|
|
Consol Defendant
SkyBridge Capital II, LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
SoftBank Group Corp.
|
|
|
Consol Defendant
Softbank Group Corp.
|
|
|
Consol Defendant
Softbank Vision Fund (AIV M2) L.P.
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Solomid Corporation
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Graham Stephan
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Thoma Bravo L.P.
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Tiger Global Management, LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Sam Trabucco
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Defendant
Gary Wang
|
|
|
Consol Defendant
Zixaio Gary Wang
|
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Vardan Balayan
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Kathy Bibby
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Leandro Cabo
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Alexander Chernyavsky
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Chukwudozie Ezeokoli
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Sean Flood
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Gary Gallant
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Edwin Garrison
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Mark Girshovich
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Russell Hawkins
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Ryan Henderson
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Shengyun Huang
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Kenny Imbert
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Sunil Kavuri
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Elliott Lam
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Erica Leeds
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Skyler Lindeen
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Michael Livieratos
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
David Nicol
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Michael Norris
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Connor O'Keefe
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Brandon Orr
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Julie Papadakis
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Gary Piano
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Gregg Podalsky
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Patrick Rabbitte
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Brandon Rowan
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Kyle Rupprecht
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Vijeth Shetty
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Steven Siskind
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Shetty Vijeth
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Vitor Vozza
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Warren Winter
|
Represented By
|
|
Consol Plaintiff
Bo Yang
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Shane Cheng
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
SkyBridge Capital II, LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
In Re
FTX Cryptocurrency Exchange Collapse Litigation
|
Represented By
|
|
Movant
Soham Bhatia
|
|
|
Movant
Michael Elliott Jessup
|
Represented By
|
|
Movant
Nicole Keane
|
|
|
Movant
Matson Magleby
|
|
|
Movant
Stephen T. Pierce
|
Represented By
|
|
Movant
Golam Sakline
|
|
|
Objector
Silvergate Capital Corporation
|
| Docket last updated: 03/28/2025 6:16 AM EDT |
| Thursday, March 27, 2025 | ||
| 860 | 860
7
pgs
order
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Thu 03/27 12:27 PM
ORDER deferring ruling on838 Motion for Leave to Take Jurisdictional Discovery (ECF No. 838) until the merits of the Sino Global Defendants' and the Temasek Defendants' Motions to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process (ECF Nos. 815, 816) are reviewed. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file a response to the Temasek Defendants and the Sino Global Defendants Motions to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process (ECF Nos. 815, 816) on or before April 4, 2025. The Sino Global Defendants and the Temasek Defendants shall file their replies on or before April 11, 2025. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 3/27/2025. See attached document for full details. (gbn) |
|
| Thursday, March 20, 2025 | ||
| 859 | 859
order
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer
Thu 03/20 11:01 AM
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant Farmington State Bank d/b/a Moonstone Bank's ("Moonstone") Unopposed Motion to Extend its Deadline to Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to its Motion to Dismiss the Amended Administrative Class Action Complaint. ("Mot.")858 . On January 15, 2025, Moonstone filed its Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 822), and on February 28, 2025, Plaintiffs filed their Response in Opposition (ECF No. 848). The deadline for Moonstone to file a Reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss is March 31, 2025. (ECF No. 831). However, on March 19, 2025, Moonstone filed a Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 857), arguing that Plaintiffs improperly included nine exhibits that are outside Plaintiffs' pleading and included unsupported and misleading statements outside of the pleadings. (ECF No. 857). In the instant Motion, Moonstone requests that the Court extend its deadline to file its Reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss "until twenty (20) days after the Court rules on its Motion to Strike, or alternatively, until twenty (20) days after Plaintiffs file a revised Opposition to Moonstone's Motion to Dismiss." Mot. at 2. Moonstone states that if the Motion to Strike is granted "it will change (potentially significantly change) the Opposition to which Moonstone would be replying" and "it would be substantively unfair to Moonstone to require it to reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition as currently constructed." Id. at 2-3. Plaintiffs do not oppose the requested relief. Id. at 3. Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion858 is GRANTED. The Court will set a deadline for Moonstone's Reply following its ruling on Moonstone's Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 3/20/2025. (gbn) |
|