Sorensen v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
| Ohio Northern District Court | |
| Judge: | Pamela A Barker |
| Case #: | 1:23-cv-01855 |
| Nature of Suit | 367 Torts - Personal Injury - Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury/Product Liability |
| Cause | 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Case Filed: | Sep 25, 2023 |
| Terminated: | Feb 05, 2024 |
| Last checked: Saturday Mar 23, 2024 11:45 AM EDT |
|
Defendant
Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc.
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Indivior PLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Indivior Solutions, Inc.
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Indivior, Inc.
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
MonoSol Rx, Inc.
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
MonoSol, LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Reckitt Benckiser LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Reckitt Benckister Healthcare (UK) Ltd.
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
David Sorensen
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 5 hours ago |
| Monday, February 05, 2024 | ||
| 14 | 14
4
pgs
order
Order Dismissing Case
Mon 02/05 3:46 PM
Transfer Order by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. In re: MDL no. 3092 Suboxone (Buprenorphine/Naloxone) Film Products Liability Litigation. Case transferred to MDL case no. 1:24-sf-65000 and assigned to the Honorable Judge J. Philip Calabrese. (M,CE) |
|
| Tuesday, December 26, 2023 | ||
| 13 | 13
notice
Stipulation (atty event)
Tue 12/26 9:38 AM
Proposed Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond or Otherwise Plead filed by All Defendants. Related document(s)1 .(Dickerson, Denise) |
|
|
order
Order
Tue 12/26 1:28 PM
Order [non-document] The Court GRANTS the parties' Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond or Otherwise Plead. (Doc. No.13 .) Defendants shall file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint by February 29, 2024. Plaintiff shall file a responsive pleading by April 15, 2024. And Defendants shall file any reply by May 6, 2024. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 12/26/2023. (P,K) |
||
| Thursday, December 14, 2023 | ||
| 12 | 12
service
Waiver of Service Executed
Thu 12/14 11:26 AM
Waiver of Service Returned Executed by David Sorensen. Reckitt Benckiser LLC waiver sent on 12/1/2023, answer due 1/30/2024 filed on behalf of David Sorensen (Sletvold, Ashlie) |
|
| 11 | 11
service
Waiver of Service Executed
Thu 12/14 11:24 AM
Waiver of Service Returned Executed by David Sorensen. Reckitt Benckister Healthcare (UK) Ltd. waiver sent on 12/1/2023, answer due 2/29/2024 filed on behalf of David Sorensen (Sletvold, Ashlie) |
|
| 10 | 10
service
Waiver of Service Executed
Thu 12/14 11:22 AM
Waiver of Service Returned Executed by David Sorensen. Indivior Solutions, Inc. waiver sent on 12/1/2023, answer due 1/30/2024 filed on behalf of David Sorensen (Sletvold, Ashlie) |
|
| 9 | 9
service
Waiver of Service Executed
Thu 12/14 11:20 AM
Waiver of Service Returned Executed by David Sorensen. Indivior PLC waiver sent on 12/1/2023, answer due 2/29/2024 filed on behalf of David Sorensen (Sletvold, Ashlie) |
|
| 8 | 8
service
Waiver of Service Executed
Thu 12/14 11:18 AM
Waiver of Service Returned Executed by David Sorensen. Indivior, Inc. waiver sent on 12/1/2023, answer due 1/30/2024 filed on behalf of David Sorensen (Sletvold, Ashlie) |
|
| 7 | 7
service
Waiver of Service Executed
Thu 12/14 11:16 AM
Waiver of Service Returned Executed by David Sorensen. Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. waiver sent on 12/1/2023, answer due 1/30/2024 filed on behalf of David Sorensen (Sletvold, Ashlie) |
|
| Thursday, November 09, 2023 | ||
| 6 | 6
notice
Notice (atty event)
Thu 11/09 4:10 PM
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL Ildiko A. Szucs filed by David Sorensen. (Sletvold, Ashlie) |
|
| Monday, October 02, 2023 | ||
|
order
Order
Mon 10/02 9:18 AM
Order [non-document] On September 28, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Response (Doc. No.5 ) to the Court's Show Cause Order (Doc. No.3 ) as well as an Amended Complaint (Doc. No.4 ). Plaintiff has satisfied the Court's Show Cause Order. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/2/2023. (P,K) |
||
| Thursday, September 28, 2023 | ||
| 5 | 5
oth_ans
Response/Reply/Sur-Reply
Thu 09/28 4:59 PM
Response to Show Cause Order filed by David Sorensen. Related document(s)3 . (Sletvold, Ashlie) |
|
| 4 | 4
cmp
Amended Complaint
Thu 09/28 4:46 PM
Amended complaint against Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior, Inc., MonoSol Rx, Inc., MonoSol, LLC, Reckitt Benckiser LLC, Reckitt Benckister Healthcare (UK) Ltd.. Filed by David Sorensen. (Sletvold, Ashlie) |
|
| Tuesday, September 26, 2023 | ||
| 3 | 3
3
pgs
order
Order to Show Cause
Tue 09/26 4:04 PM
Order to Show Cause. Within 14 days of the date of this Order, the Court orders Plaintiff to (a) identify the citizenship of all of Defendants MonoSol LLC's and Reckitt Benckiser LLC's members at the time the Complaint was filed; and (b) show cause why the instant case should not be dismissed sua sponte for lack of complete diversity of citizenship because Defendant Indivior Solutions, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of Ohio. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 9/26/2023. (P,K) |
|
| Monday, September 25, 2023 | ||
| 2 | 2
oth_evt
Summons Issued
Mon 09/25 2:29 PM
Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon All Defendants.. (H,Ch) |
|
|
Att: 1
Magistrate Consent Form
|
||
| 1 | 1
56
pgs
cmp
Complaint
Mon 09/25 1:44 PM
Complaint with jury demand against Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior, Inc., MonoSol Rx, Inc., MonoSol, LLC, Reckitt Benckiser LLC, Reckitt Benckister Healthcare (UK) Ltd. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-12196002. Filed by David Sorensen. (Sletvold, Ashlie) |
|
|
Att: 1
Civil Cover Sheet,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Summons
|
||
|
utility
Add and Terminate Judge
Mon 09/25 2:19 PM
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
||
|
oth_evt
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge
Mon 09/25 2:21 PM
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. (H,Ch) |
||
|
order
Order
Fri 09/29 11:14 AM
Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for guidance or clarification regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the status of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Courts immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 9/25/2023. (P,K) |
||