LS 37 v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
Consolidated
Lead case: 3:23-md-03084
Lead case: 3:23-md-03084
California Northern District Court | |
Judge: | Charles R Breyer |
Case #: | 3:23-cv-04393 |
Nature of Suit | 365 Torts - Personal Injury - Product Liability |
Cause | 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Case Filed: | Aug 25, 2023 |
Last checked: Wednesday Feb 21, 2024 12:27 AM PST |
Defendant
Rasier, LLC
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Rasier-CA, LLC
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Uber Technologies, Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Jane Doe LS 37
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 69 minutes ago |
Wednesday, April 10, 2024 | ||
21 | 21
![]() AMENDED COMPLAINT Short-Form Complaint against All Defendants. Filed by Jane Doe LS 37. (Levin, William) |
|
Monday, October 23, 2023 | ||
utility
MDL Member Case
Mon 10/23 9:24 AM
MEMBER CASE MDL 3084: 3:23-cv-04393-CRB LS 37 v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al pursuant to Order Relating Cases (Docket 13 in 23-md-03084-CRB) cc: JPMDL (wsn, COURT STAFF) |
||
Friday, October 20, 2023 | ||
20 | 20
![]() ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Charles R. Breyer for all further proceedings. Judge Jon S. Tigar no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 10/20/23. (as, COURT STAFF) |
|
19 | 19
![]() ORDER RELATING CASES. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/20/2023. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) |
|
Thursday, September 28, 2023 | ||
18 | 18
![]() |
|
Tuesday, September 26, 2023 | ||
17 | 17
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Friday, September 22, 2023 | ||
16 | 16
![]() |
|
15 | 15
![]() |
|
14 | 14
![]() |
|
13 | 13
![]() |
|
Thursday, September 21, 2023 | ||
12 | 12
![]() |
|
11 | 11
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
10 | 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (wft, COURT STAFF) | |
Wednesday, September 20, 2023 | ||
9 | 9
![]() |
|
8 | 8
![]() |
|
7 | 7
![]() |
|
Friday, August 25, 2023 | ||
6 | 6
![]() |
|
5 | 5
![]() |
|
4 | 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/8/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) | |
3 | 3
![]() |
|
2 | 2
![]() |
|
1 | 1
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |