X Corp. v Media Matters for America et al
Texas Northern District Court | |
Judge: | Reed C O'Connor |
Case #: | 4:23-cv-01175 |
Nature of Suit | 190 Contract - Other Contract |
Cause | 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Case Filed: | Nov 20, 2023 |
Case in other court: | United States Court of Appeals 5th Circuit, 24-10900 |
Last checked: Saturday May 18, 2024 4:30 AM CDT |
Defendant
Eric Hananoki
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Media Matters for America
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Angelo Carusone
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
X Corp.
|
Represented By
|
TERMINATED PARTIES | |
Movant
Darlene Cerezo Swaffar
Terminated: 11/30/2023
2745 W. Hillsboro Blvd., Suite 1
Deerfield Beach, FL 33442 |
Docket last updated: 2 hours ago |
Friday, January 10, 2025 | ||
138 | 138
1
pgs
order
Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney
Fri 01/10 1:04 PM
ORDER: Before the Court is Defendants137 Unopposed Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel ("Motion"). After consideration of the Motion, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Attorney Daniela Lorenzo of the Elias Law Group is withdrawn from this matter due to her departure from Elias Law Group. Attorney Daniela Lorenzo terminated. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/10/2025) (jnp) |
|
Thursday, January 09, 2025 | ||
137 | 137
motion
Withdraw as Attorney
Thu 01/09 12:45 PM
Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Angelo Carusone, Media Matters for America, Eric Hananoki (Lorenzo, Daniela) |
|
Friday, January 03, 2025 | ||
136 | 136
8
pgs
order
Order on Motion to Compel
Fri 01/03 3:10 PM
ORDER: The Court concludes that the95 Motion is hereby DEFFERED in Part and DENIED in part. The Court SUSTAINS in part Defendants' objections based on the Texas Press Shield. Defendants SHALL deliver the ten (10) documents identified by Plaintiff for in camera review no later than 14 days from this Order to chambers in a secure envelope or contained clearly marked as documents for in camera review only. Having ruled that the Texas Press Shield may apply in this litigation, the Court DEFERS ruing on the identified documents until after an in camera review. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/3/2025) (jnp) |
|
135 | 135
9
pgs
order
Order on Motion to Compel
Fri 01/03 3:03 PM
ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants'113 Motion to Compel is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's objection to RFP Nos. 9 and 26, RFA No. 5, and Interrogatory No. 6 are SUSTAINED. All other objections raised by Plaintiff are OVERRULED. The parties SHALL COMPLY with this Order. (See order for specifics.) (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/3/2025) (jnp) |