California Southern District Court
Case #: 3:24-mj-00493
Case Filed:Feb 12, 2024
Terminated:Mar 07, 2024
Last checked: Tuesday Feb 13, 2024 11:25 PM PST
Defendant
Vanessa Marie Alvarez (1)
Represented By
Jamie Elizabeth Schmid
Federal Defenders Of San Diego, Inc.
contact info
Federal Defenders
Federal Defenders Of San Diego
contact info
Plaintiff
USA
Represented By
U S Attorney CR
U S Attorneys Office Southern District Of California
contact info
Eric Chiang
Doj-Usao
contact info


Docket last updated: 02/07/2025 9:09 AM PST
Saturday, February 10, 2024
Arrest of Vanessa Marie Alvarez (no document attached) (mme)
Related: [-]
Monday, February 12, 2024
1 1 4 pgs COMPLAINT as to Vanessa Marie Alvarez.(mme)
Related: [-]
Att: 1 Info Sheet
2 2 Set/Reset Duty Hearings as to Vanessa Marie Alvarez: Initial Appearance set for 2/12/2024 before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. (no document attached) (mef)
Related: [-]
3 3 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard: Initial Appearance as to Vanessa Marie Alvarez held on 2/12/2024. Oral proffer confirmed. Appointed Attorney Federal Defenders for Vanessa Marie Alvarez. Bond set as to Vanessa Marie Alvarez (1) $10,000 PS secured by defendant and 1 FRA. Rule 5 advisement provided. ( Preliminary Hearing set for 2/22/24 at 9:30am before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. Arraignment set for 3/7/24 at 9:30am before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. ) (CD# 2/12/2024 AHG 24-1:2:16-3:36). (Plaintiff Attorney Joel Doolin AUSA). (Defendant Attorney Emily Child FD-S/A). (aje)
Related: [-]
4 4 ***English. No Interpreter needed as to Vanessa Marie Alvarez (no document attached) (aje)
Related: [-]
6 6 2 pgs ORDER Setting Conditions of Release. Bond set for Vanessa Marie Alvarez (1) $10,000 PS secured by 1 FRA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard on 2/12/2024. (cxl)
Related: [-]
9 9 2 pgs ORDER as to Vanessa Marie Alvarez: The Court orders the United States to comply with the continuing duty to disclose evidence which is favorable to the defendant as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny. Upon finding that the government has failed to comply with this order, the Court may, as appropriate, order the production of such information, grant a continuance, impose evidentiary sanctions, or, in extreme cases, dismiss charges.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard on 2/12/24. (aje)
Related: [-]