Arizona District Court
Case #: 4:24-cr-00681
Case Filed:Feb 14, 2024
Last checked: Saturday Feb 17, 2024 12:46 AM MST
Defendant
Tadeo Bezsarra-Fierro (3)
Represented By
Francisco Leon
Law Office Of Franciso Leon
contact info
Defendant
Jonathan Mora-Leon (1)
Represented By
Ryan Moore
Federal Public Defenders Office - Tucson
contact info
Defendant
Armando Puentes-Melendez (2)
Represented By
Guenevere Dawn Nelson-Melby
Nelson-Melby Law PLLC
contact info
Plaintiff
USA
Represented By
Ashley Bock Culver
Us Attorneys Office - Tucson, Az
contact info


Docket last updated: 02/17/2024 1:57 AM MST
Thursday, January 18, 2024
Arrest of Jonathan Mora-Leon, Armando Puentes-Melendez, Tadeo Bezsarra-Fierro on 1/18/2024. (JAM) [4:24-mj-01436-N/A-LCK]
Related: [-]
Monday, January 22, 2024
1 1 COMPLAINT as to Jonathan Mora-Leon (1), Armando Puentes-Melendez (2), Tadeo Bezsarra-Fierro (3). (JAM) [4:24-mj-01436-N/A-LCK]
Related: [-]
Tuesday, January 23, 2024
2 2 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald: Initial Appearance as to Jonathan Mora-Leon, Armando Puentes-Melendez, Tadeo Bezsarra-Fierro held on 1/23/2024. DEFENDANTS SWORN AS TO FINANCIAL STATUS. Defendant(s) state true name to be the same. Government's motion for detention and request for continuance of the Detention Hearing is granted. Defendant(s) temporarily detained in the custody of the U.S. Marshal. Interpreter required for Jonathan Mora-Leon (1) Spanish and Armando Puentes-Melendez (2) Spanish and Tadeo Bezsarra-Fierro (3) Spanish. Appearances : AUSA Jon Granoff, duty for the Government, CJA Attorney Richard Bacal, duty for defendant. Defendant is present and in custody. Spanish Interpreter Irene Lopez-Obrecht assists defendant. Detention Hearing set for 1/25/2024 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M Rateau. Preliminary Hearing set for 1/25/2024 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M Rateau. Related [+] Hearing held 2:10 pm to 2:50 pm. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BHA) [4:24-mj-01436-N/A-LCK]
Related: [-] corded by COURTSMART.
3 3 ORDER: Under federal law, including Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and all applicable decisions from the Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit interpreting Brady , the government has a continuing obligation to produce all information or evidence known to the government relating to guilt or punishment that might reasonably be considered favorable to the defendant's case, even if the evidence is not admissible so long as it is reasonably likely to lead to admissible evidence. See United States v. Price , 566 F.3d 900,913 n.14 (9th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, the court orders the government to produce to the defendant in a timely manner all such information or evidence. Information or evidence may be favorable to a defendant's case if it either may help bolster the defendant's case or impeach a prosecutor's witness or other government evidence. If doubt exists, it should be resolved in favor of the defendant with full disclosure being made. If the government believes that a required disclosure would compromise witness safety, victim rights, national security, a sensitive law-enforcement technique, or any other substantial government interest, the government may apply to the Court for a modification of the requirements of this Disclosure Order, which may include in camera review and/or withholding or subjecting to a protective order all or part of the information. This Disclosure Order is entered under Rule 5(f) and does not relieve any party in this matter of any other discovery obligation. The consequences for violating either this Disclosure Order or the government's obligations under Brady include, but are not limited to, the following: contempt, sanction, referral to a disciplinary authority, adverse jury instruction, exclusion of evidence, and dismissal of charges. Nothing in this Disclosure Order enlarges or diminishes the government's obligation to disclose information and evidence to a defendant under Brady , as interpreted and applied under Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit precedent. As the Supreme Court noted, "the government violates the Constitution's Due Process Clause 'if it withholds evidence that is favorable to the defense and material to the defendant's guilt or punishment." ' Turner v. United States , 137 S. Ct. 1885, 1888 (2017), quoting Smith v. Cain , 565 U.S. 73, 75 (2012). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald.(BHA)(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) [4:24-mj-01436-N/A-LCK]
Related: [-]
4 4 MINUTE ORDER: Added attorney Ryan Moore- FPD for Jonathan Mora-Leon, Guenevere Dawn Nelson-Melby- CJA for Armando Puentes-Melendez, Francisco Leon- CJA for Tadeo Bezsarra-Fierro. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO) [4:24-mj-01436-N/A-LCK]
Related: [-]
Thursday, January 25, 2024
8 8 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M Rateau: Detention Hearing as to Jonathan Mora-Leon held on 1/25/2024. Defendant ordered detained pending trial. Preliminary Hearing waived. Finding: Defendant held to answer before District Court. Appearances : AUSA Pete Sabori, attorney on duty for the Government. AFPD Ryan Moore for defendant. Defendant is present and in custody. Spanish Interpreter Juan Cordova assists defendant. Related [+] Hearing held 10:30 AM to 10:39 AM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (CAB) [4:24-mj-01436-N/A-LCK]
Related: [-] corded by COURTSMART.
9 9 ORDER OF DETENTION as to Jonathan Mora-Leon. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M Rateau on 1/25/2024.(CAB) [4:24-mj-01436-N/A-LCK]
Related: [-]
10 10 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M Rateau: Detention Hearing as to Armando Puentes-Melendez held on 1/25/2024. Defendant ordered detained pending trial. Preliminary Hearing waived. Finding: Defendant held to answer before District Court. Appearances : AUSA Pete Sabori, attorney on duty for the Government. CJA Attorney Guenevere Nelson-Melby for defendant. Defendant is present and in custody. Spanish Interpreter Juan Cordova assists defendant. Related [+] Hearing held 10:30 AM to 10:39 AM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (CAB) [4:24-mj-01436-N/A-LCK]
Related: [-] corded by COURTSMART.
11 11 ORDER OF DETENTION as to Armando Puentes-Melendez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M Rateau on 1/25/2024.(CAB) [4:24-mj-01436-N/A-LCK]
Related: [-]
12 12 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M Rateau: Detention Hearing as to Tadeo Bezsarra-Fierro held on 1/25/2024. Defendant ordered detained pending trial. Preliminary Hearing waived. Finding: Defendant held to answer before District Court. Appearances : AUSA Pete Sabori, attorney on duty for the Government. CJA Attorney Francisco Leon for defendant. Defendant is present and in custody. Spanish Interpreter Juan Cordova assists defendant. Related [+] Hearing held 10:30 AM to 10:39 AM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (CAB) [4:24-mj-01436-N/A-LCK]
Related: [-] corded by COURTSMART.
13 13 ORDER OF DETENTION as to Tadeo Bezsarra-Fierro. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M Rateau on 1/25/2024.(CAB) [4:24-mj-01436-N/A-LCK]
Related: [-]
Thursday, February 01, 2024
14 14 NOTICE of Intent to Destroy Contraband by USA as to Jonathan Mora-Leon, Armando Puentes-Melendez, Tadeo Bezsarra-Fierro. (Culver, Ashley) [4:24-mj-01436-N/A-LCK]
Related: [-]
Wednesday, February 14, 2024
15 15 INDICTMENT Related [+] as to Jonathan Mora-Leon (1) count(s) 1, 2-3, 4-5, Armando Puentes-Melendez (2) count(s) 1, 5, Tadeo Bezsarra-Fierro (3) count(s) 1, 5. Arraignment set for 3/8/2024 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald. Counsel to advise defendants wishing to waive their appearance at the Arraignment Hearing of the following proposed dates: Trial: 4/16/2024; Plea Deadline: 3/29/2024. NOTE: The process for waiving defendant's appearance at Arraignment has changed. There is no longer a need to file a Notice of Intent to File Waiver of Defendants Appearance. Instead, signed appearance waivers may be electronically filed using the Waiver of Defendants Presence at Arraignment and Acknowledgement of Trial Date event. The event is located under Criminal Event Categories: Other Filings/Waivers. The signed Waiver must be filed no later than 12:00 PM the business day prior to the scheduled arraignment. Failure of defense counsel to file a timely waiver (or a timely motion to continue) may result in the reappointment of defense counsel. (ARC)
Related: [-] dacted for Public Disclosure
17 17 SEALED UNREDACTED INDICTMENT as to Jonathan Mora-Leon, Armando Puentes-Melendez, Tadeo Bezsarra-Fierro. (KAH)
Related: [-]