Linfo IP, LLC v. Trustpilot, Inc.

New York Southern District Court
Judge:	Jesse M Furman
Case #:	1:24-cv-02796
Nature of Suit	830 Property Rights - Patent
Cause	35:271 Patent Infringement

Case Filed:	Apr 12, 2024
Terminated:	Jan 03, 2025

Last checked: Saturday Oct 12, 2024 6:48 AM EDT

Defendant Trustpilot, Inc.	Represented By Kyle S. Sorenson Mcdermott Will & Emery LLP contact info Aashish G. Kapadia Mcdermott Will & Emery LLP contact info Kevin J. Meek Mcdermott Will & Emery LLP contact info Andrew Bennett Kratenstein Mcdermott Will & Emery LLP contact info
Plaintiff Linfo IP, LLC	Represented By David John Hoffman Law Office David J. Hoffman contact info

Docket last updated: 01/29/2025 11:59 PM EST

Wednesday, January 15, 2025
41		41 appeal USCA Case Number Wed 01/15 4:52 PM NOTICE OF DOCKETING and, USCA Case Number 25-1368 from the USCA Federal Circuit assigned to40 Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Linfo IP, LLC. (tp) Related: [-]
Wednesday, January 08, 2025
40		40 appeal Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit Wed 01/08 1:13 PM NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT from37 Memorandum & Opinion,,,,,,,,,,38 Clerk's Judgment,,,,,,,,,,. Form 7 and Form 22 are due within 14 days. Document filed by Linfo IP, LLC. Filing fee $ 605.00, receipt number ANYSDC-30428089..(Hoffman, David) Modified on 1/8/2025 (km) Related: [-]
		appeal Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to USCA Wed 01/08 3:21 PM Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re:40 Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit.(km) Related: [-]
Friday, January 03, 2025
39		39 3 pgs misc AO 120 Form Patent - Case Terminated - Submitted Fri 01/03 3:14 PM AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 1/3/2025 in a court action filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).(km) Related: [-]
38		38 order Judgment - Clerk Fri 01/03 3:10 PM CLERK'S JUDGMENT re:37 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Trustpilot, Inc. against Linfo IP, LLC. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated January 3, 2025, the 428 Patent's claims are directed to an abstract idea and, on that basis, not eligible for patent protection. Accordingly, Trustpilot's motion to dismiss must be and is GRANTED, and the Complaint is DISMISSED. Linfo requests leave to amend. See Pl.'s Oppn 13-14. Although leave to amend should be freely given "when justice so requires," Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), it is "within the sound discretion of the district court to grant or deny leave to amend, Broidy Cap. Mgmt. LLC v. Benomar, 944 F.3d 436, 447 (2d Cir. 2019). Here, the problem with Linfo's claims is substantive, so amendment would be futile. See, e.g., Roundtree v. NYC, No. 19-CV-2475 (JMF), 2021 WL 1667193, at 6 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 28, 2021) (citing cases); Ghaly Devices, 443 F. Supp. 3d at 434 (denying leave to replead where patent claims were found ineligible). Notably, in seeking leave to amend, Linfo states only that it "is warranted, to permit [P]laintiff to assert factual allegations and theories, so that Plaintiffs case can be adjudicated on its merits." Pl.s Oppn 13-14. But this conclusory statement offers no suggestion that Linfo is in possession of facts that would cure the problems with its claims. See, e.g., Clark v. Kitt, No. 12-CV-8061 (CS), 2014 WL 4054284, at 15 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 15, 2014) ("A plaintiff need not be given leave to amend if [it] fails to specify how amendment would cure the pleading deficiencies in [its] complaint."); accord TechnoMarine SA v. Giftports, Inc., 758 F.3d 493, 505-06 (2d Cir. 2014). Finally, the Court granted Linfo leave to amend in response to Trustpilot's first motion to dismiss and explicitly warned that it would "not be given any further opportunity to amend the complaint to address issues raised by the motion to dismiss." ECF No. 29. "Plaintiffs failure to fix deficiencies in its previous pleadings is alone sufficient ground to deny leave to amend sua sponte." Transeo S.A.R.L. v. Bessemer Venture Partners VI L.P., 936 F. Supp. 2d 376, 415 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (citing cases)). Accordingly, Linfo's request for leave to amend is DENIED. Judgment is entered in favor of Trustpilot; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 1/3/2025) (km) Related: [-]
		Att: 1 Appeal Package
37		37 16 pgs order Memorandum & Opinion Fri 01/03 11:04 AM OPINION AND ORDER re:31 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by Trustpilot, Inc. For the foregoing reasons, the 428 Patent's claims are directed to an abstract idea and, on that basis, not eligible for patent protection. Accordingly, Trustpilot's motion to dismiss must be and is GRANTED, and the Complaint is DISMISSED. Linfo requests leave to amend. See Pl.'s Oppn 13-14. Although leave to amend should be freely given "when justice so requires," Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), it is "within the sound discretion of the district court to grant or deny leave to amend, Broidy Cap. Mgmt. LLC v. Benomar, 944 F.3d 436, 447 (2d Cir. 2019). Here, the problem with Linfo's claims is substantive, so amendment would be futile. See, e.g., Roundtree v. NYC, No. 19-CV-2475 (JMF), 2021 WL 1667193, at 6 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 28, 2021) (citing cases); Ghaly Devices, 443 F. Supp. 3d at 434 (denying leave to replead where patent claims were found ineligible). Notably, in seeking leave to amend, Linfo states only that it "is warranted, to permit [P]laintiff to assert factual allegations and theories, so that Plaintiffs case can be adjudicated on its merits." Pl.s Oppn 13-14. But this conclusory statement offers no suggestion that Linfo is in possession of facts that would cure the problems with its claims. See, e.g., Clark v. Kitt, No. 12-CV-8061 (CS), 2014 WL 4054284, at 15 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 15, 2014) ("A plaintiff need not be given leave to amend if [it] fails to specify how amendment would cure the pleading deficiencies in [its] complaint."); accord TechnoMarine SA v. Giftports, Inc., 758 F.3d 493, 505-06 (2d Cir. 2014). Finally, the Court granted Linfo leave to amend in response to Trustpilot's first motion to dismiss and explicitly warned that it would "not be given any further opportunity to amend the complaint to address issues raised by the motion to dismiss." ECF No. 29. "Plaintiffs failure to fix deficiencies in its previous pleadings is alone sufficient ground to deny leave to amend sua sponte." Transeo S.A.R.L. v. Bessemer Venture Partners VI L.P., 936 F. Supp. 2d 376, 415 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (citing cases)). Accordingly, Linfo's request for leave to amend is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 31, to enter judgment in favor of Trustpilot consistent with this Opinion and Order, and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 1/3/25) (yv) Related: [-]
Monday, October 07, 2024
36		36 respm Declaration in Support of Motion Mon 10/07 1:41 PM DECLARATION of Andrew B. Kratenstein in Support re:31 MOTION to Dismiss .. Document filed by Trustpilot, Inc...(Kratenstein, Andrew) Related: [-]
		Att: 1 Exhibit 1: Linfo v. Academy Resp. Br,
		Att: 2 Exhibit 2: Princess Polly Resp. Br,
		Att: 3 Exhibit 3: Academy Op. Br
35		35 respm Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion Mon 10/07 1:24 PM REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re:31 MOTION to Dismiss . . Document filed by Trustpilot, Inc...(Kratenstein, Andrew) Related: [-]
Monday, September 30, 2024
34		34 respm Response to Motion Mon 09/30 6:52 PM RESPONSE to Motion re:31 MOTION to Dismiss . . Document filed by Linfo IP, LLC..(Hoffman, David) Related: [-]
		Att: 1 Proposed Order Denying Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint
Tuesday, September 17, 2024
33		33 1 pgs order Order on Motion to Dismiss Tue 09/17 5:53 PM ORDER denying as moot27 Motion to Dismiss In light of Defendants new motion to dismiss, see ECF No. 31, Defendant's earlier motion to dismiss filed at ECF No. 27 is hereby DENIED as moot. Plaintiff's opposition to the new motion to dismiss is due by September 30, 2024. Defendants reply, if any, is due by October 7, 2024. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 27. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 9/17/2024) (jca) Related: [-]
		utility Set/Reset Deadlines Tue 09/17 5:54 PM Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 9/30/2024 Replies due by 10/7/2024. (jca) Related: [-]
Monday, September 16, 2024
32		32 30+ pgs respm Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion Mon 09/16 3:07 PM MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re:31 MOTION to Dismiss . . Document filed by Trustpilot, Inc...(Kratenstein, Andrew) Related: [-]
31		31 motion Dismiss Mon 09/16 3:05 PM MOTION to Dismiss . Document filed by Trustpilot, Inc...(Kratenstein, Andrew) Related: [-]
Tuesday, August 27, 2024
		notice Notice of Redesignation to Magistrate Judge Thu 08/29 10:52 PM NOTICE OF REDESIGNATION TO ANOTHER MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The above entitled action has been redesignated to Magistrate Judge Henry J. Ricardo to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Please note that this is a reassignment of the designation only. (mml) Related: [-]
Monday, August 26, 2024
30		30 cmp Amended Complaint Mon 08/26 10:08 AM FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT amending1 Complaint against Trustpilot, Inc. with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Linfo IP, LLC. Related document:1 Complaint..(Hoffman, David) Related: [-]
		Att: 1 Exhibit A - 9,092,428 Patent,
		Att: 2 Exhibit B - 9,092,428 Claim Chart
Monday, August 05, 2024
29		29 1 pgs order Order ~Util - Set Deadlines/Hearings Tue 08/06 11:09 AM ORDER, It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file any amended complaint by August 26, 2024. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 15.1, available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/rules, any amended complaint should be filed with a redline showing all differences between the original and revised filings. Plaintiff will not be given any further opportunity to amend the complaint to address issues raised by the motion to dismiss. If no amended complaint is filed, Plaintiff shall file any opposition to the motion to dismiss by August 26, 2024. Defendant's reply, if any, shall be filed by September 2, 2024. Finally, it is further ORDERED that the initial pretrial conference previously scheduled for August 9, 2024 is adjourned sine die. SO ORDERED. ( Amended Pleadings due by 8/26/2024., Responses due by 8/26/2024, Replies due by 9/2/2024.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 8/5/24) (yv) Related: [-]
28		28 30+ pgs respm Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion Mon 08/05 1:08 PM MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re:27 MOTION to Dismiss . . Document filed by Trustpilot, Inc...(Kratenstein, Andrew) Related: [-]
27		27 motion Dismiss Mon 08/05 1:07 PM MOTION to Dismiss . Document filed by Trustpilot, Inc...(Kratenstein, Andrew) Related: [-]
Thursday, August 01, 2024
26		26 order Memo Endorsement ~Util - Set Hearings Thu 08/01 3:08 PM MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re:25 Letter, filed by Trustpilot, Inc. ENDORSEMENTThe Court will hold the initial pretrial conference but it is hereby ADJOURNED to Friday, August 9, 2024, at 3:00 p.m. The call-in instructions remain the same. The parties should be prepared to discuss their proposed claim construction and discovery schedules. SO ORDERED. ( Initial Conference set for 8/9/2024 at 03:00 PM before Judge Jesse M. Furman.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 8/1/2024) (jca) Related: [-]
Wednesday, July 31, 2024
25		25 misc Letter Wed 07/31 7:39 PM JOINT LETTER addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Andrew B. Kratenstein dated 7/31/24 re: Joint Initial Pretrial Conference. Document filed by Trustpilot, Inc...(Kratenstein, Andrew) Related: [-]
		Att: 1 Exhibit A- Proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order,
		Att: 2 Exhibit B- Proposed Scheduling Order
Monday, July 29, 2024
24		24 order Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Mon 07/29 4:54 PM ORDER granting22 Motion for Kyle Sorenson to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Jesse M. Furman)(Text Only Order) (Furman, Jesse) Related: [-]
23		23 1 pgs order Order Mon 07/29 2:48 PM ORDER. Counsel are reminded that, per the Court's earlier Scheduling Order, they must submit their proposed case management plan and joint letter by the Thursday prior to the upcoming conference. The parties should indicate in their joint letter whether they can do without a conference altogether. If so, the Court may enter a case management plan and scheduling order and the parties need not appear. If not (or if the Court concludes that, the parties' views notwithstanding, a conference should be held), the Court will hold the initial conference by telephone, albeit perhaps at a different time. To that end, counsel should indicate in their joint letter dates and times during the week of the conference that they would be available for a telephone conference. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, however, the conference will proceed and will do so on the date and time previously set. In the event a conference is held, the parties should join it by calling the Court's dedicated conference line at (888) 363-4749 and using access code 542-1540, followed by the pound (#) key. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 7/29/24) (yv) Related: [-]
22		22 motion Appear Pro Hac Vice Mon 07/29 2:16 PM MOTION for Kyle Sorenson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Trustpilot, Inc...(Sorenson, Kyle) Related: [-]
		Att: 1 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Good Standing,
		Att: 2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration,
		Att: 3 Proposed Order Order
21		21 motion Appear Pro Hac Vice Mon 07/29 12:08 PM FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - MOTION for Kyle Sorenson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29669683. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Trustpilot, Inc...(Sorenson, Kyle) Modified on 7/29/2024 (bc) Related: [-]
		Att: 1 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Good Standing,
		Att: 2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration,
		Att: 3 Proposed Order Order
		misc Notice Regarding Deficient Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Mon 07/29 1:06 PM >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. 21 MOTION for Kyle Sorenson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29669683. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Texas;. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. (bc) Related: [-]
		misc Notice Regarding Pro Hac Vice Motion Mon 07/29 2:24 PM >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. 22 MOTION for Kyle Sorenson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bc) Related: [-]
Sunday, July 14, 2024
20		20 order Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Sun 07/14 8:54 AM ORDER granting18 Motion for Aashish Kapadia to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Jesse M. Furman)(Text Only Order) (Furman, Jesse) Related: [-]
19		19 order Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Sun 07/14 8:53 AM ORDER granting17 Motion for Kevin Meek to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Jesse M. Furman)(Text Only Order) (Furman, Jesse) Related: [-]
Wednesday, July 10, 2024
18		18 motion Appear Pro Hac Vice Wed 07/10 2:36 PM MOTION for Aashish Kapadia to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29586744. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Trustpilot, Inc...(Kapadia, Aashish) Related: [-]
		Att: 1 Exhibit 1: Good Standing,
		Att: 2 Exhibit 2: Declaration in support,
		Att: 3 Proposed Order Proposed Order
		misc Notice Regarding Pro Hac Vice Motion Wed 07/10 3:48 PM >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. 18 MOTION for Aashish Kapadia to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29586744. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bc) Related: [-]
Tuesday, July 09, 2024
17		17 motion Appear Pro Hac Vice Tue 07/09 4:09 PM MOTION for Kevin Meek to Appear Pro Hac Vice receipt number ANYSDC-29579429 . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Trustpilot, Inc...(Meek, Kevin) Related: [-]
		Att: 1 Exhibit 1: Certificate of Good Standing,
		Att: 2 Exhibit 2: Declaration in Support,
		Att: 3 Proposed Order Proposed Order
16		16 motion Appear Pro Hac Vice Tue 07/09 11:41 AM FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - MOTION for Kevin Meek to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29579429. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Trustpilot, Inc...(Meek, Kevin) Modified on 7/9/2024 (bc) Related: [-]
		Att: 1 Exhibit 1: Certificate of Good Standing,
		Att: 2 Exhibit 2: Declaration in Support,
		Att: 3 Proposed Order Proposed ORder
		misc Notice Regarding Deficient Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Tue 07/09 12:17 PM >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. 16 MOTION for Kevin Meek to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29579429. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Texas;. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. (bc) Related: [-]
		misc Notice Regarding Pro Hac Vice Motion Tue 07/09 4:55 PM >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. 17 MOTION for Kevin Meek to Appear Pro Hac Vice receipt number ANYSDC-29579429. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bc) Related: [-]
Friday, June 14, 2024
15		15 1 pgs order Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Fri 06/14 11:47 AM ORDER granting12 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re12 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re:1 Complaint addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from David J. Hoffman dated 06/12/2024. Application GRANTED. The initial pretrial conference scheduled for July 10, 2024 is hereby ADJOURNED to August 7, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. The Clerk is directed to terminate ECF No. 12. SO ORDERED. Trustpilot, Inc. answer due 8/5/2024. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 6/14/2024) (jca) Related: [-]
		utility Set/Reset Hearings Fri 06/14 11:48 AM Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Conference set for 8/7/2024 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesse M. Furman. (jca) Related: [-]
Wednesday, June 12, 2024
14		14 misc Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Wed 06/12 1:12 PM RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Trustpilot A/S, Other Affiliate Trustpilot Group Plc for Trustpilot, Inc.. Document filed by Trustpilot, Inc...(Kratenstein, Andrew) Related: [-]
13		13 notice Notice of Appearance Wed 06/12 1:05 PM NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrew Bennett Kratenstein on behalf of Trustpilot, Inc...(Kratenstein, Andrew) Related: [-]
12		12 motion Extension of Time to File Answer Wed 06/12 12:53 PM CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re:1 Complaint addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from David J. Hoffman dated 06/12/2024. Document filed by Linfo IP, LLC. Return Date set for 8/5/2024 at 05:00 PM..(Hoffman, David) Related: [-]
Tuesday, June 11, 2024
11		11 service Summons Returned Executed Tue 06/11 3:32 PM SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Trustpilot, Inc. served on 5/30/2024, answer due 6/20/2024. Service was accepted by Osmara Martinez. Document filed by Linfo IP, LLC..(Hoffman, David) Related: [-]
Thursday, April 25, 2024
10		10 3 pgs order Order for Initial Pretrial Conference Thu 04/25 11:20 AM NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: The conference will be held remotely by telephone in accordance with Paragraph 3.B of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases. The parties should join the conference by calling the Court's dedicated conference line at (888) 363-4749 and using access code 542-1540, followed by the pound (#) key. All counsel must also familiarize themselves with the Court's Individual Rules, which are available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-m-furman. Absent leave of Court obtained by letter-motion filed before the conference, all pretrial conferences must be attended by the attorney who will serve as principal trial counsel. As further set forth by this Order. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 7/10/2024 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesse M. Furman. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/25/2024) (tg) Related: [-]
Monday, April 22, 2024
		utility Case Declined as Not Related Mon 04/22 4:20 PM CASE DECLINED AS NOT RELATED. Case referred as related to 1:24-cv-01163-JLR and declined by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon and returned to wheel for assignment. (vba) Related: [-]
		notice Notice of Case Assignment/Reassignment Mon 04/22 4:22 PM NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Jesse M. Furman. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) Related: [-]
		utility Case Designation Mon 04/22 4:22 PM Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link:[LINK:https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf] . (vba) Related: [-]
Thursday, April 18, 2024
9		9 misc Statement of Relatedness Thu 04/18 1:45 PM STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 1:24-cv-1163. Document filed by Linfo IP, LLC..(Hoffman, David) Related: [-]
		Att: 1 Exhibit A
Monday, April 15, 2024
8		8 misc AO 120 Form Patent - Case Opening - Submitted Mon 04/15 2:33 PM AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (vf) Related: [-]
7		7 service Summons Issued Mon 04/15 2:31 PM ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Trustpilot, Inc.. (vf) Related: [-]
		misc Notice to Attorney Regarding Case Opening Statistical Error Correction Mon 04/15 10:46 AM ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney David John Hoffman. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code New York. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of State. (vf) Related: [-]
		misc Notice to Attorney Regarding Deficient Civil Cover Sheet Mon 04/15 10:47 AM ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney David John Hoffman to RE-FILE Document No. 2 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Related Case Number information not reflected on Form. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. (vf) Related: [-]
		misc Notice to Attorney to Submit/File Related Case Statement Mon 04/15 10:47 AM ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE RELATED CASE STATEMENT. Notice to Attorney David John Hoffman, for non compliance with Local Rule 13 of the Division of Business Among Judges. Attorney must electronically file the Related Case Statement. Use the event type Statement of Relatedness found under the event list Other Documents. (vf) Related: [-]
		notice Case Opening Initial Assignment Notice Mon 04/15 2:29 PM CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. (vf) Related: [-]
		utility Case Designated ECF Mon 04/15 2:29 PM Case Designated ECF. (vf) Related: [-]
		utility Case Referred as Possibly Related/Similar Mon 04/15 2:30 PM CASE REFERRED TO Judge Jennifer L. Rochon as possibly related to 1:24-cv-01163-JLR. (vf) Related: [-]
Friday, April 12, 2024
6		6 notice Notice (Other) Fri 04/12 3:53 PM NOTICE of Notice of Related Cases. Document filed by Linfo IP, LLC..(Hoffman, David) Related: [-]
		Att: 1 Exhibit A
5		5 misc Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Fri 04/12 3:52 PM RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Linfo IP, LLC..(Hoffman, David) Related: [-]
4		4 service Request for Issuance of Summons Fri 04/12 3:50 PM REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to TrustPilot, Inc., re:1 Complaint. Document filed by Linfo IP, LLC..(Hoffman, David) Related: [-]
3		3 1 pgs misc AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark - Notice of Submission by Attorney Fri 04/12 3:47 PM AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Hoffman, David) Related: [-]
2		2 misc Civil Cover Sheet Fri 04/12 3:46 PM CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Hoffman, David) Related: [-]
1		1 6 pgs cmp Complaint Fri 04/12 3:43 PM COMPLAINT against Trustpilot, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-29213610)Document filed by Linfo IP, LLC..(Hoffman, David) Related: [-]
		Att: 1 Exhibit A,
		Att: 2 Exhibit B

Continue to Create Account