Marquez v. Peterson et al
South Dakota District Court | |
Judge: | Karen E Schreier |
Case #: | 5:24-cv-05041 |
Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
Cause | 42:1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights |
Case Filed: | Jun 07, 2024 |
Terminated: | Mar 13, 2025 |
Last checked: Friday Dec 06, 2024 4:11 AM CST |
Defendant
Rachael Lindsay
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Pennington County Public Defender's Office
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Pennington County States Attorney's Office
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Nicholas J. Peterson
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Christina M. Marquez
927 Columbus Street, #4
Rapid City, SD 57701 |
Docket last updated: 9 hours ago |
Tuesday, April 08, 2025 | ||
24 | 24
![]() USCA Case Number and Appeal Briefing Schedule Order for22 Notice of Appeal filed by Christina M. Marquez. USCA Case Number: 25-1687 (TAL) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Monday, April 07, 2025 | ||
23 | 23
![]() TRANSMITTAL of Notice of Appeal to 8th Circuit Court of Appeals re22 Notice of Appeal. (SLT) |
|
22 | 22
![]() NOTICE OF APPEAL as to21 Judgment by Christina M. Marquez. (SLT) |
|
appeal
USCA Appeal Fees
Mon 04/07 2:06 PM
USCA Appeal Fees received $ 605 receipt number 500001033 re22 Notice of Appeal filed by Christina M. Marquez. (SLT) |
||
Thursday, March 13, 2025 | ||
21 | 21
![]() JUDGMENT in favor of Pennington County Public Defender's Office, Pennington County States Attorney's Office, Nicholas J. Peterson, Rachael Lindsay against Christina M. Marquez. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 03/13/2025. (JMS) Modified on 3/13/2025 mailed to Christina Marquez. (JMS). Modified on 3/14/2025 mailed appeal packet.(JMS) |
|
20 | 20
![]() ORDER granting5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying as moot17 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 03/13/2025. (JMS) Modified on 3/13/2025 mailed to Christina Marquez. (JMS) |
|
Tuesday, January 21, 2025 | ||
19 | 19
![]() RESPONSE to Motion re17 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT, 18 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Nicholas J. Peterson, Pennington County Public Defender's Office, Rachael Lindsay, Pennington County States Attorney's Office. (Williams, Richard) |
|
Thursday, January 02, 2025 | ||
18 | 18
![]() AMENDED MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Christina M. Marquez. (SLT) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Tuesday, December 31, 2024 | ||
17 | 17
![]() MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Christina M. Marquez. (JMS) |
|
Tuesday, October 29, 2024 | ||
16 | 16
![]() REPLY to Motion Response re5 MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim filed by Christina M. Marquez. (SLT) |
|
Monday, August 19, 2024 | ||
15 | 15
![]() REPLY to12 Response to Motion to Dismiss filed by Rachael Lindsay, Pennington County Public Defender's Office, Pennington County States Attorney's Office, Nicholas J. Peterson. (Williams, Richard) |
|
14 | 14
![]() AMENDED DOCUMENT by Rachael Lindsay, Pennington County Public Defender's Office, Pennington County States Attorney's Office, Nicholas J. Peterson. Amendment to5 MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim ,6 Memorandum in Support of Motion,4 Notice of Appearance,7 Affidavit in Support of Motion,8 Memorandum in Support of Motion Amended Certificate of Service (Williams, Richard) |
|
Thursday, August 08, 2024 | ||
13 | 13
![]() ORDER denying as moot11 Motion Requesting Service by United States Marshal Service. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 8/8/2024. MAILED to Ms. Marquez (SAC) |
|
Monday, August 05, 2024 | ||
12 | 12
![]() RESPONSE to Motion re5 MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim filed by Christina M. Marquez. (SKK) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Thursday, August 01, 2024 | ||
11 | 11
![]() MOTION for Order to Have U.S. Marshalls [sic] Serve Defendants by Christina M. Marquez. (SKK) |
|
Tuesday, July 23, 2024 | ||
10 | 10
![]() RETURN OF SERVICE Executed upon Defendants Rachael Lindsay, Pennington County Public Defender's Office, Pennington County States Attorney's Office on 07/10/2024 (SAC) (Main Document 10 replaced on 7/23/2024) (SAC) |
|
9 | 9
![]() RETURN OF SERVICE Executed upon Defendant Nicholas J. Peterson on 6/26/2024 (SAC) |
|
Tuesday, July 02, 2024 | ||
8 | 8
![]() MEMORANDUM in Support re5 MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim filed by All Defendants. (Williams, Richard) |
|
7 | 7
![]() AFFIDAVIT in Support re5 MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim filed by All Defendants. (Williams, Richard) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
6 | 6
![]() MEMORANDUM in Support re5 MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim filed by Rachael Lindsay, Pennington County Public Defender's Office, Pennington County States Attorney's Office, Nicholas J. Peterson. (Williams, Richard) |
|
5 | 5
![]() MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim by Rachael Lindsay, Pennington County Public Defender's Office, Pennington County States Attorney's Office, Nicholas J. Peterson. (Williams, Richard) |
|
4 | 4
![]() NOTICE of Appearance by Richard M. Williams on behalf of All Defendants. (Williams, Richard) |
|
Thursday, June 13, 2024 | ||
3 | 3
![]() Summons Issued as to Rachael Lindsay, Pennington County Public Defender's Office, Pennington County States Attorney's Office, Nicholas J. Peterson. 4 Summons(es), AO 85 form and Rule 73 delivered via hand delivery in RC clerk's office to Pro Se Plaintiff (SAC) |
|
Friday, June 07, 2024 | ||
2 | 2
misc
New Case Letter - Nonprisoner Case
Fri 06/07 2:54 PM
NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF: The Clerks Office has received your Complaint together with the filing fee and incorrectly completed summons(es) or no summons(es). A new case has been opened. We are unable to issue summon(es) at this time. Enclosed is a blank summons form and a sample completed summons form. Follow the enclosed instructions to properly complete your summons(es). As soon as the Clerks Office receives your properly completed summons(es), it/they will be issued. Copy of docket sheet, blank summons form, and sample completed summons form with instructions sent to plaintiff. Pro Se Litigant Registration Form for Electronic Notice handed to plaintiff at counter. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Pursuant to the E-Government Act and D.S.D. Civ. LR 5.2, you must redact personal identifiers from documents submitted to the Court. The Clerks Office will not review for compliance. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. A request to electronically file documents in your case must be made through the PACER Service Center at www.pacer.uscourts.gov. The plaintiff must keep the Court informed of the plaintiff's address changes, including changes to primary and secondary email addresses. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned as undelivered, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (SKK) |
|
1 | 1
![]() COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, $405 fee paid, receipt# 50000769, filed by Christina M. Marquez. (SKK) |