|
|
Arrest of Jose David Meza Diaz (no document attached) (fjp)
Related: [-]
|
5
|
|
5
***Spanish Interpreter needed as to Jose David Meza Diaz (no document attached) (aje)
Related: [-]
|
1
|
|
1
COMPLAINT as to Jose David Meza Diaz.(fjp)
Related: [-]
|
| |
Att: 1
Info Sheet
|
2
|
|
2
Minute Order by Judge David D. Leshner: Material Witness Attorney Christian M. Ham for Daniel Reyes Angeles,Carlos Andres Campos Martinez,for An Bertha Alejandre appointed. Set/Reset Duty Hearings as to Jose David Meza Diaz: Initial Appearance set for 8/27/2024 before Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner. (no document attached) (gac)
Related: [-]
|
3
|
|
3
NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Brendan Barber appearing for USA. (Barber, Brendan)Attorney Brendan Barber added to party USA(pty:pla) (ggv).
Related: [-]
|
6
|
|
6
CJA 23 Financial Affidavit by Jose David Meza Diaz (ecf)
Related: [-]
|
7
|
|
7
DETENTION ORDER as to Jose David Meza Diaz. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner on 8/27/24. (ecf)
Related: [-]
|
9
|
|
9
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner: Initial Appearance as to Jose David Meza Diaz held on 8/27/2024. Federal Defenders appointed. Bond set as to Jose David Meza Diaz (1) No Bail. Detention Hearing as to Jose David Meza Diaz held on 8/27/2024. USA oral motion for detention; motion granted as to Jose David Meza Diaz. Defendant ordered detained without prejudice. Order of detention to be filed by Court. Preliminary Hearing set for 9/5/24 at 9:00 am before Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner. Arraignment set for 9/24/24 at 9:30 am before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt. MW Counsel Christian Ham confirmed. (Interpreter Indra Zuno-Pantoja). (CD# 8/27/2024 DDL 2:28; 3:03-3:11). (Plaintiff Attorney Alex Biggs AUSA). (Defendant Attorney Jory Burks FD). (ecf) Modified on 8/28/2024 (ecf).
Related: [-]
|
13
|
|
13
ORDER as to Jose David Meza Diaz: The Court orders the United States to comply with the continuing duty to disclose evidence which is favorable to the defendant as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny. Upon finding that the government has failed to comply with this order, the Court may, as appropriate, order the production of such information, grant a continuance, impose evidentiary sanctions, or, in extreme cases, dismiss charges. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner on 8/27/24. (aje)
Related: [-]
|