USA v. Alvarez-De Quiroz
| California Southern District Court | |
| Case #: | 3:24-mj-03925 |
| Case Filed: | Oct 15, 2024 |
| Last checked: Friday Oct 18, 2024 1:15 AM PDT |
|
Defendant
Alma Gabriela Alvarez-De Quiroz (1)
|
Represented By
|
|
Material Witness
D.N.L.L
|
|
|
Plaintiff
USA
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 10/18/2024 3:03 AM PDT |
| Monday, October 14, 2024 | ||
| Arrest of Alma Gabriela Alvarez-De Quiroz (no document attached) (ecf) | ||
| Tuesday, October 15, 2024 | ||
| 3 | 3 Set/Reset Duty Hearings as to Alma Gabriela Alvarez-De Quiroz: Initial Appearance set for 10/15/2024 before Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres. (no document attached) (fjp) | |
| 5 | 5 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres: Government oral motion to unseal the case as to Alma Gabriela Alvarez-De Quiroz (1) is granted. Initial Appearance as to Alma Gabriela Alvarez-De Quiroz held on 10/15/2024. Appointed Federal Defenders for Alma Gabriela Alvarez-De Quiroz. Bond set as to Alma Gabriela Alvarez-De Quiroz (1) $20,000 PS secured by 2 FRA(1 related). Travel extended to the Eastern District of California. Rule 5 advisement provided. ( Preliminary Hearing set for 10/29/24 at 1:30pm before Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres. Arraignment set for 11/12/24 at 1:30pm before Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres.) (Sealed Clerk Notified) (Interpreter Cynthia Herber). (CD# 10/15/2024 VET 24-1:4:10-4:41). (Plaintiff Attorney Alex Biggs AUSA). (Defendant Attorney Mayra Lopez FD-S/A). (aje) | |
| 8 | 8 ***Spanish Interpreter needed as to Alma Gabriela Alvarez-De Quiroz (no document attached) (aje) | |
| 11 | 11
ORDER Setting Conditions of Release. Bond set for Alma Gabriela Alvarez-De Quiroz (1) $20,000 PS secured by 2 FRA(1 related).. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres on 10/15/24. (ecf)
|
|
| 12 | 12
CJA 23 Financial Affidavit by Alma Gabriela Alvarez-De Quiroz (ecf)
|
|
| 14 | 14
ORDER as to Alma Gabriela Alvarez-De Quiroz: The Court orders the United States to comply with the continuing duty to disclose evidence which is favorable to the defendant as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny. Upon finding that the government has failed to comply with this order, the Court may, as appropriate, order the production of such information, grant a continuance, impose evidentiary sanctions, or, in extreme cases, dismiss charges.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres on 10/15/24. (aje)
|
|