Zeng v. Mayorkas et al
| New York Eastern District Court | |
| Judge: | Nina Gershon |
| Case #: | 1:24-cv-07375 |
| Nature of Suit | 465 Immigration - Other Immigration Actions |
| Cause | 05:551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| Case Filed: | Oct 22, 2024 |
| Last checked: Tuesday Oct 22, 2024 1:12 PM EDT |
|
Defendant
Ur M. Jaddou
|
|
|
Defendant
Alejandro N. Mayorkas
|
|
|
Defendant
Mathew Varghese
|
|
|
Defendant
Christopher A. Wray
|
|
|
Plaintiff
Yue Zeng
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 2 hours ago |
| Monday, October 28, 2024 | ||
| 5 | 5
notice
Notice of Appearance
Mon 10/28 2:00 PM
NOTICE of Appearance by Dara A Olds on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Olds, Dara) |
|
| 4 | 4
service
Summons Returned Executed as to USA
Mon 10/28 11:41 AM
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Yue Zeng. Ur M. Jaddou served on 10/28/2024, answer due 12/27/2024; Alejandro N. Mayorkas served on 10/28/2024, answer due 12/27/2024; Mathew Varghese served on 10/28/2024, answer due 12/27/2024; Christopher A. Wray served on 10/28/2024, answer due 12/27/2024. (Figueroa-Brusi, H. Esteban) |
|
| Tuesday, October 22, 2024 | ||
| 3 | 3
misc
Quality Control Check - Attorney Case Opening
Tue 10/22 3:51 PM
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SDM) |
|
| 2 | 2
service
Summons Issued as to USA
Tue 10/22 3:41 PM
Summons Issued as to Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Mathew Varghese, Christopher A. Wray, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (SDM) |
|
| 1 | 1
cmp
Complaint
Tue 10/22 1:09 PM
COMPLAINT against Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Mathew Varghese, Christopher A. Wray filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-18413703 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Yue Zeng. (Figueroa-Brusi, H. Esteban) |
|
|
Att: 1
Civil Cover Sheet,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Exhibit,
|
||
|
Att: 3
Proposed Summons
|
||
|
utility
Case Assigned/Reassigned
Tue 10/22 3:38 PM
Case Assigned to Judge Nina Gershon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our[LINK:website] . Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SDM) |
||