LEE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
| District Of Columbia District Court | |
| Judge: | Christopher R Cooper |
| Case #: | 1:24-cv-03165 |
| Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Cause | 20:1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child |
| Case Filed: | Nov 08, 2024 |
| Last checked: Friday Nov 08, 2024 10:08 AM EST |
|
Defendant
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
|
|
|
Plaintiff
MARY FREED
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
NANELLE LEE
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
WILLIAM LEE
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 11/15/2024 11:59 PM EST |
| Friday, November 15, 2024 | ||
| 4 | 4
motion
Sealed Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym
Fri 11/15 10:34 AM
SEALED MOTION to Proceed Under Pseudonym by N.L., W.L., M.L..(Rosenstock, Paula) Modified event on 11/15/2024 (znmw) |
|
|
Att: 1
Text of Proposed Order,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Exhibit
|
||
| Wednesday, November 13, 2024 | ||
|
order
Order on Sealed Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym
Wed 11/13 3:33 PM
MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: 1) Plaintiffs'3 Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as it does not address the five-factor inquiry that applies to such motions, see In re Sealed Case , 971 F.3d 324, 326-27 (D.C. Cir. 2020); 2) Within fourteen days of the Court's Order, Plaintiffs shall file either a new Motion that addresses the factors identified in In re Sealed Case or a Notice advising the Clerk of the Court whether they wish to proceed under their true names, and, if so, they shall also file their3 Motion on the public docket; and 3) If Plaintiffs do not file a new Motion or such Notice within fourteen days, the Clerk is directed to terminate the case. The factors identified in In re Sealed Case are:1 whether the justification asserted by the requesting party is merely to avoid the annoyance and criticism that may attend any litigation or is to preserve privacy in a matter of a sensitive and highly personal nature;2 whether identification poses a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to the requesting party or, even more critically, to innocent non-parties;3 the ages of the persons whose privacy interests are sought to be protected; 4 whether the action is against a governmental or private party; and, relatedly, 5 the risk of unfairness to the opposing party from allowing an action against it to proceed anonymously. So ORDERED by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg on November 13, 2024. (lcjeb4) |
||
| Friday, November 08, 2024 | ||
| 3 | 3
motion
Miscellaneous Relief
Fri 11/08 10:27 AM
MOTION to Proceed Anonymously by NANELLE LEE, WILLIAM LEE, MARY FREED.(Rosenstock, Paula) |
|
|
Att: 1
Text of Proposed Order,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Exhibit Redacted Complaint
|
||
| 2 | 2
service
Electronic Summons Issued as to AUSA,USAG
Fri 11/08 10:26 AM
SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(zmtm) |
|
|
Att: 1
Notice and Consent
|
||
| 1 | 1
cmp
Complaint
Fri 11/08 9:26 AM
COMPLAINT against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11287611) filed by NANELLE LEE, MARY FREED, WILLIAM LEE.(Rosenstock, Paula) |
|
|
Att: 1
Civil Cover Sheet,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Summons,
|
||
|
Att: 3
Summons
|
||
|
utility
Case Assigned/Reassigned
Fri 11/08 10:02 AM
Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (zmtm) |
||