CCA and B, LLC v. Jenkins
| Ohio Northern District Court | |
| Judge: | Pamela A Barker |
| Case #: | 1:24-cv-02004 |
| Nature of Suit | 820 Property Rights - Copyrights |
| Cause | 17:501 Copyright Infringement |
| Case Filed: | Nov 15, 2024 |
| Last checked: Friday Nov 15, 2024 3:22 PM EST |
|
Defendant
Elena Jenkins
|
|
|
Plaintiff
CCA and B, LLC
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 4 hours ago |
| Friday, November 15, 2024 | ||
| 5 | 5
oth_evt
Summons Issued
Fri 11/15 2:12 PM
Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Elena Jenkins.. (H,Ch) |
|
|
Att: 1
Magistrate Consent Form
|
||
| 4 | 4
oth_doc
Report Regarding Copyright Action - AO121
Fri 11/15 1:41 PM
Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Copyright (AO121) filed by CCA and B, LLC. (Johnson, Mark) |
|
| 3 | 3
oth_doc
Report Regarding Patent or Trademark Action - AO120
Fri 11/15 1:40 PM
Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by CCA and B, LLC. (Johnson, Mark) |
|
| 2 | 2
notice
Corporate Disclosure Statement (atty event)
Fri 11/15 1:38 PM
Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by CCA and B, LLC. (Johnson, Mark) |
|
| 1 | 1
12
pgs
cmp
Complaint
Fri 11/15 1:28 PM
Complaint with jury demand against Elena Jenkins. Filing fee paid $ 405, Receipt number AOHNDC-12832479. Filed by CCA and B, LLC. (Johnson, Mark) |
|
|
Att: 1
Exhibit A - Trademark Registration Certificates,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Exhibit B - Photographs of Copyrighted Works,
|
||
|
Att: 3
Exhibit C - Copyright Registration Certificates,
|
||
|
Att: 4
Exhibit D - Jenkins Poshmark Listings,
|
||
|
Att: 5
Exhibit E - Jenkins Facebook Listings,
|
||
|
Att: 6
Civil Cover Sheet,
|
||
|
Att: 7
Summons
|
||
|
utility
Add and Terminate Judge
Fri 11/15 2:10 PM
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
||
|
oth_evt
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge
Fri 11/15 2:11 PM
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes, Jr. (H,Ch) |
||
|
order
Order
Fri 11/15 2:28 PM
Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for guidance or clarification regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the status of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Court's immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 11/15/2024. (P,K) |
||