CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BRADLEY et al
| Pennsylvania Eastern District Court | |
| Judge: | Juan R Sanchez |
| Case #: | 2:24-cv-06155 |
| Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Cause | 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Case Filed: | Nov 12, 2024 |
| Re-opened: | Mar 05, 2025 |
| Terminated: | Mar 05, 2025 |
| Last checked: Friday Dec 27, 2024 3:36 AM EST |
|
Defendant
PROTHONOTARY JOSEPH SELETYN
|
|
|
Defendant
JENNIFER MACNOUGHTON
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE DANIEL D. MCCAFFERY
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE TAMIKA MONTGOMERY-REEVES
|
|
|
Defendant
MUNICIPAL COURT OF PHILADELPHIA
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE MARY P. MURRAY
|
|
|
Defendant
Thomas Marro
|
|
|
Defendant
PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT EASTERN DISTRICT
|
|
|
Defendant
PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE GENE E.K. PRATTER
|
|
|
Defendant
REBECCA RHYNHART
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE JOSHUA ROBERTS
|
|
|
Defendant
LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR & SAMPSON, LLP
|
|
|
Defendant
MELISSA SIMOLA
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE MEGAN SULLIVAN
|
|
|
Defendant
SUPERIOR COURT EASTERN DISTRICT
|
|
|
Defendant
Summit Park East, GP
|
|
|
Defendant
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
|
|
|
Defendant
TRACY TRIPP
|
|
|
Defendant
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT OF PA
|
|
|
Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PA
|
|
|
Defendant
UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO.
|
|
|
Defendant
ATTORNEY PHOENICIA WALLACE
|
|
|
Defendant
ALEXANDRA DESANTIS
|
|
|
Defendant
MICHAEL AMMANN
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE DANIEL ANDERS
|
|
|
Defendant
ATTORNEY IRENE BIZOSSO
|
|
|
Defendant
MARY JANE BOWES
|
|
|
Defendant
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
INTERVENOR 6225 ELLSWORTH STREET
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19143 |
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE CRYSTAL BRYANT-POWELL
|
|
|
Defendant
ATTORNEY LAUREN BURGESS
|
|
|
Defendant
COMMON PLEAS COURT OF PHILADELPHIA
|
|
|
Defendant
COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
|
|
|
Defendant
ADA JAMES DELLAFIORA
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE ALICE BECK DUBOW
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE PATRICK F. DUGAN
|
|
|
Defendant
JILL FREEMAN
|
|
|
Defendant
DARIN GATTI
|
|
|
Defendant
FEIGE GRUNDMAN
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE MICHELE D. HANGLEY
|
|
|
Defendant
JANE AND JOHN DOES
|
|
|
Defendant
JANE OR JOHN DOE
|
|
|
Defendant
JANE/JOHN DOES
|
|
|
Defendant
ATTORNEY AMY KIRBY
|
|
|
Plaintiff
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
|
GPO
Dec 13 2024
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 12/13/24. 12/16/24 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
|
|
GPO
Dec 13 2024
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT 1. This case is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), because this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.2. The Motion for Recusal (ECF No. 15) and the Motions to Reconsider and Vacate the Courts November 21, 2021 Order (ECF Nos. 16, 20) are DENIED.3. The Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1), Motion to Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 4), Motion for ECF (ECF No. 8), Request to Add Defendant (ECFNo. 9), Motion to Correct the Record (ECF No. 12), Writ of Certiorari (ECF No. 13), Motion toSupplement the Writ to Join Defendants (ECF No. 14), Motion for Service (ECF No. 17),Motion to Amend Answers (ECF No. 18), Motion to be Excused from Presenting the Court andOther Parties with Original Copies (ECF No. 19), and Motion to Enter Exhibits on USB FlashDrive to Docket (ECF No. 24) are DENIED AS MOOT.4. The Court certifies that any appeal from this Order is not taken in good faith. See28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A).5. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 12/13/24. 12/16/24 ENTERED & E-MAILED. CERTIFIED COPY SENT TO CCP PHILA.(fdc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/16/2024: # (1) Certified Order) (fdc). |
| Docket last updated: 03/09/2025 11:59 PM EDT |
| Friday, March 07, 2025 | ||
| 69 | 69
appeal
USCA Order
Fri 03/07 4:42 PM
ORDER of USCA. Order that Aisha Bradley appeals from the District Court's December 13, 2024 orders remanding her cases in E.D. Pa. Civ. No. 2-24-cv-06054, -06155, and -06156 to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). We have appellate jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, see 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); BP P.L.C. v. Mayor & City Council of Balt., 141 S. Ct. 1532, 1538 (2021), and we exercise plenary review over the District Court's remand decisions, see Lazorko v. Pa. Hosp., 237 F.3d 242, 247 (3d Cir. 2000). Because this appeal does not present a substantial question, we summarily affirm the District Courts December 13, 2024 decisions. See 3d Cir. I.O.P. 10.6. We conclude, for substantially the reasons provided by the District Court, that Bradley did not advance a facially permissible theory of removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(a), § 1442(a), or § 1443(1) or (2). We see no error in the District Court's November 21, 2024 orders in E.D. Pa. Civ. No. 2-24-cv-06054, -06155, and -06156 revoking Bradley's privilege to use the District Court's Electronic Document Submission Tool. Bradley's outstanding motions are denied.(fdc) |
|
| Wednesday, March 05, 2025 | ||
| 68 | 68
2
pgs
order
Order on Motion for Reconsideration
Wed 03/05 2:37 PM
ORDER THAT, PURSUANT TO THE ALL WRITS ACT, 28 USC SEC. 1651(A), BRADLEY IS ENJOINED FROM FILING ANY FURTHER MOTIONS OR DOCUMENTS IN THIS CASE APART FROM A NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THIS ORDER. IF BRADLEY FILES ANY DOCUMENT IN THIS CASE APART FROM A NOTICE OF APPEAL, THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO RETURN THAT DOCUMENT, UNFILED, TO BRADLEY WITH A COPY OF THIS ORDER. BRADLEY'S59 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER TO RULE TO SHOW CAUSE IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 3/5/25.3/5/25 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
|
| 67 | 67
2
pgs
order
Order on Motion for Recusal Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Wed 03/05 2:24 PM
ORDER THAT THE61 MOTION FOR RECUSAL IS DENIED. THE EMERGENCY MOTION FOR INJUNCTION62 IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 3/5/25.3/5/25 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
|