CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BRADLEY et al
| Pennsylvania Eastern District Court | |
| Judge: | Juan R Sanchez |
| Case #: | 2:24-cv-06156 |
| Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Cause | 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Case Filed: | Nov 12, 2024 |
| Terminated: | Dec 13, 2024 |
| Last checked: Friday Dec 27, 2024 3:37 AM EST |
|
Defendant
PA SUPREME COURT PER CURIAM JANE/JOHN DOES FOR THE JUNE 26-23, ORDER AT CASE 12 EM 2023
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE MARY JANE BOWES (J-S03006-23 /393 EDA 2022)
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE MARY P. MURRAY (J-S16034-23/2100 EDA 2022)
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE MEGAN SULLIVAN (J-S03006-23/393 EDA 2022)
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE MICHELE D. HANGLEY
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE PATRICK F. DUGAN
|
|
|
Defendant
Judge Tamika Montgomery-Reeves
|
|
|
Defendant
LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR & SAMPSON, LLP
|
|
|
Defendant
JENNIFER MACNAUGHTON
|
|
|
Defendant
MUNICIPAL COURT OF PHILADELPHIA
|
|
|
Defendant
Thomas Marro
|
|
|
Defendant
PA SUPREME COURT PER CURIAM JANE/JOHN DOES FOR THE AUG. 11-23, ORDER AT CASE 43 EM 2023
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE JOSHUA ROBERTS
|
|
|
Defendant
PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT EASTERN DISTRICT
|
|
|
Defendant
PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
|
|
|
Defendant
PROTHONOTARY JOSEPH SELETYN
|
|
|
Defendant
REBECCA RHYNHART
|
|
|
Defendant
MELISSA SIMOLA
|
|
|
Defendant
SUPERIOR COURT EASTERN DISTRICT
|
|
|
Defendant
SUPERIOR COURT PER CURIAM-JANE/JOHN DOES FOR THE JULY 11, 2022, ORDER AT CASES 1166 EDA 2022 AND 1167 EDA 2022
|
|
|
Defendant
Summit Park East, GP
|
|
|
Defendant
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT OF PA
|
|
|
Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PA
|
|
|
Defendant
UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO.
|
|
|
Defendant
COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
|
|
|
Defendant
ADA JAMES DELLAFIORA
|
|
|
Defendant
MICHAEL AMMANN
|
|
|
Defendant
ATTORNEY AMY KIRBY
|
|
|
Defendant
ATTORNEY IRENE BIZOSSO
|
|
|
Defendant
ATTORNEY PHOENICIA WALLACE
|
|
|
Defendant
ATTORNEY TRACY TRIPP
|
|
|
Defendant
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
6225 ELLSWORTH STREET
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19143 |
|
|
Defendant
ATTORNEY LAUREN BURGESS
|
|
|
Defendant
COMMON PLEAS COURT OF PHILADELPHIA
|
|
|
Defendant
COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PA PER CURIAM JANE/JOHN DOES FOR THE JAN. 10-23, ORDER AT CASES 1192 CD 2022, 1193 CD 2022, 1194 CD 2022
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE GENE E.K. PRATTER
|
|
|
Defendant
ALEXANDRA DESANTIS
|
|
|
Defendant
JILL FREEMAN
|
|
|
Defendant
DARIN GATTI
|
|
|
Defendant
FEIGE GRUNDMAN
|
|
|
Defendant
JANE AND JOHN DOES
|
|
|
Defendant
JANE OR JOHN DOE
|
|
|
Defendant
JOHN AND JANE DOES
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE ALICE BECK DUBOW (J-S16034-23/2100 EDA 2022)
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE CRYSTAL BRYANT-POWELL
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE DANIEL ANDERS
|
|
|
Defendant
JUDGE DANIEL D. MCCAFFERY(J-S03006-23/393 EDA 2022)
|
|
|
Plaintiff
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
|
|
|
Respondent
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
|
GPO
Dec 13 2024
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 12/13/24. 12/16/24 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
|
|
GPO
Dec 13 2024
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT 1. This case is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), because this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.2. The Motion for Recusal (ECF No. 18) and the Motions to Reconsider and Vacate the Courts November 21, 2021 Order (ECF Nos. 14, 19) are DENIED.3. The Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1), Motion to Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 4), Motion for ECF Filing (ECF No. 7), Request to Add Defendant List (ECF No. 8), Motion to Correct the Record (ECF No. 9), Writ of Certiorari (ECF No. 10), Motion to Supplement the Writ (ECF No. 11), Motion to be Excused from Presenting the Court and Other Parties with Original Copies (ECF No. 12), Motion for Service (ECF No. 13), Motion to Enter Exhibits on USB Flash Drive to Docket (ECF No. 17), and Motion for Service (ECF No. 20), are DENIED AS MOOT. 4.The Court certifies that any appeal from this Order is not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A).5. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 12/13/24. 12/16/24 ENTERED & E-MAILED. CERTIFIED COPY SENT TO CCP PHILA.(fdc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/16/2024: # (1) Certified Order) (fdc). |
| Docket last updated: 03/09/2025 11:59 PM EDT |
| Friday, March 07, 2025 | ||
| 63 | 63
appeal
USCA Order
Fri 03/07 11:06 AM
ORDER of USCA as to59 Notice of Appeal filed by AISHA ASHA BRADLEY. Aisha Bradley appeals from the District Courts December 13, 2024 orders remandingher cases in E.D. Pa. Civ. No. 2-24-cv-06054, -06155, and -06156 to the Court ofCommon Pleas of Philadelphia County pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). We haveappellate jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, see 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); BP P.L.C. v. Mayor & City Council of Balt., 141 S. Ct. 1532, 1538 (2021), and we exercise plenary review over the District Courts remand decisions, see Lazorko v. Pa. Hosp., 237 F.3d 242, 247 (3d Cir. 2000). Because this appeal does not present a substantial question, we summarily affirm the District Courts December 13, 2024 decisions. See 3d Cir. I.O.P.10.6. We conclude, for substantially the reasons provided by the District Court, that Bradley did not advance a facially permissible theory of removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(a), § 1442(a), or § 1443(1) or (2). We see no error in the District Courts November 21, 2024 orders in E.D. Pa. Civ. No. 2-24-cv-06054, -06155, and -06156 revoking Bradleys privilege to use the District Courts Electronic Document Submission Tool. Bradleys outstanding motions are denied. (mbh) |
|
| Wednesday, March 05, 2025 | ||
| 62 | 62
2
pgs
order
Order
Thu 03/06 8:37 AM
ORDER THAT PURSUANT TO THE ALL WRITS ACT, BRADLEY IS ENJOINED FROM FILING ANY FURTHER MOTIONS OR DOCUMENTS IN THIS CASE APART FROM A NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THIS ORDER. IF BRADLEY FILES ANY DOCUMENT IN THIS CASE APART FROM A NOTICE OF APPEAL, THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO RETURN THE DOCUMENT, UNFILED, TO BRADLEY, WITH A COPY OF THIS ORDER. BRADLEY'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER TO RULE SHOW CAUSE (ECF NO. 52) IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO (1) FILE ECF NO 53 AND ECF NO 54 AS "EXHIBITS" TO ECF NO 52 AND (2) TO TERMINATE ECF NOS 53 AND 54 AS IT IS APPEARENT BRADLEY DOES NOT SEEK RELIEF FROM THE COURT IN THOSE DOCUMENTS. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 3/5/25. 3/6/25 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh) |
|
| 61 | 61
2
pgs
order
Order on Motion to Stay
Thu 03/06 8:29 AM
ORDER THAT THE REQUEST FOR RECUSAL OF THE UNDERSIGNED IS DENIED. THE EXPEDITED MOTION TO STAY IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 3/5/25. 3/6/25 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh) |
|