Brik v. Fogel et al
| New York Southern District Court | |
| Case #: | 1:24-cv-08845 |
| Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Cause | 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Case Filed: | Nov 12, 2024 |
| Last checked: Thursday Nov 21, 2024 2:17 AM EST |
|
Defendant
Jonathan Fogel
|
|
|
Defendant
Pat Swinney Kaufman
|
|
|
Defendant
Samer Nasser
|
|
|
Defendant
Joe Nguyen
|
|
|
Defendant
Stanislav (Stas) Skarbo
|
|
|
Plaintiff
Roman Brik
805 Willowbrook Rd
Staten Island, NY 10314 |
| Docket last updated: 3 hours ago |
| Wednesday, November 20, 2024 | ||
| 2 | 2
order
Standing Order re Cases Filed By Pro Se Plaintiffs
Wed 11/20 4:11 PM
STANDING ORDER IN RE CASES FILED BY PRO SE PLAINTIFFS (See 24-MISC-127 Standing Order filed March 18, 2024). To ensure that all cases heard in the Southern District of New York are handled promptly and efficiently, all parties must keep the court apprised of any new contact information. It is a party's obligation to provide an address for service; service of court orders cannot be accomplished if a party does not update the court when a change of address occurs. Accordingly, all self-represented litigants are hereby ORDERED to inform the court of each change in their address or electronic contact information. Parties may[LINK:consent to electronic service] to receive notifications of court filings by email, rather than relying on regular mail delivery. Parties may also ask the court for[LINK:permission to file documents electronically] . Forms, including instructions for consenting to electronic service and requesting permission to file documents electronically, may be found by clicking on the hyperlinks in this order, or by accessing the forms on the courts website, nysd.uscourts.gov/forms. The procedures that follow apply only to cases filed by pro se plaintiffs. If the court receives notice from the United States Postal Service that an order has been returned to the court, or otherwise receives information that the address of record for a self-represented plaintiff is no longer valid, the court may issue an Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with this order. Such order will be sent to the plaintiffs last known address and will also be viewable on the court's electronic docket. A notice directing the parties' attention to this order shall be docketed (and mailed to any self-represented party that has appeared and has not consented to electronic service) upon the opening of each case or miscellaneous matter that is classified as pro se in the court's records. (Signed by Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/18/2024) (tro) |
|
|
service
Note Regarding Service on Self-Represented Party
Wed 11/20 4:11 PM
CASE MANAGEMENT NOTE: For each electronic filing made in a case involving a self-represented party who has not consented to electronic service, the filing party must serve the document on such self-represented party in a manner permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2) (other than through the ECF system) and file proof of service for each document so served. Please see[LINK:Rule 9.2] of the courts ECF Rules & Instructions for further information..(tro) |
||
| Tuesday, November 12, 2024 | ||
| 1 | 1
cmp
Complaint
Wed 11/20 4:06 PM
COMPLAINT against Jonathan Fogel, Pat Swinney Kaufman, Samer Nasser, Joe Nguyen, Stanislav (Stas) Skarbo. Document filed by Roman Brik.(tro) |
|
|
utility
Case Designated ECF
Wed 11/20 4:08 PM
Case Designated ECF. (tro) |
||