Oloruntoba v. Varghese et al
| New York Eastern District Court | |
| Judge: | Hector Gonzalez |
| Case #: | 1:24-cv-08496 |
| Nature of Suit | 465 Immigration - Other Immigration Actions |
| Cause | 28:1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| Case Filed: | Dec 12, 2024 |
| Last checked: Thursday Dec 12, 2024 1:09 PM EST |
|
Defendant
Ur Mendoza Jaddou
|
|
|
Defendant
Ted H. Kim
|
|
|
Defendant
Alejandro N. Mayorkas
|
|
|
Defendant
Mathew C. Varghese
New York Asylum Office 1065 Stewart Avenue Suite 200
Bethpage, NY 11714 |
|
|
Plaintiff
Olumide Olumuyiwa Oloruntoba
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 11 hours ago |
| Thursday, December 12, 2024 | ||
| 3 | 3
service
Summons Issued as to USA
Thu 12/12 2:36 PM
Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Mathew C. Varghese, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (SDM) |
|
| 2 | 2
motion
Appear Pro Hac Vice
Thu 12/12 2:35 PM
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Glenn Eric Sproull) . (SDM) |
|
| 1 | 1
cmp
Complaint
Thu 12/12 2:30 PM
COMPLAINT against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Mathew C. Varghese, filed by Olumide Olumuyiwa Oloruntoba. (SDM) |
|
|
Att: 1
Civil Cover Sheet,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Letter,
|
||
|
Att: 3
Exhibit A,
|
||
|
Att: 4
Exhibit B,
|
||
|
Att: 5
Exhibit C,
|
||
|
Att: 6
Exhibit D,
|
||
|
Att: 7
Exhibit E,
|
||
|
Att: 8
Exhibit F,
|
||
|
Att: 9
Exhibit G,
|
||
|
Att: 10
Exhibit H,
|
||
|
Att: 11
Exhibit I
|
||
|
misc
Filing Fee Received
Thu 12/12 2:37 PM
FILING FEE: $ 405.00, receipt number 100018257 (SDM) |
||
|
misc
Filing Fee Received
Thu 12/12 2:40 PM
PRO HAC VICE FILING FEE: $ 200.00, receipt number 100018257 (SDM) |
||
|
order
Status Report Order
Thu 12/12 3:33 PM
ORDER: Plaintiff shall file a letter no longer than three pages on or before January 3, 2025, describing Plaintiff's efforts to serve Plaintiff's complaint and a summons on each Defendant. If Plaintiff fails to file the letter required by this order, or if Plaintiff's letter demonstrates a lack of diligence in attempting service, then the Court is unlikely to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to complete service under Rule 4(m) in the absence of unusual circumstances demonstrating good cause. The Court will not extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file the letter required by this order unless Plaintiff requests an extension in accordance with Section I.D of the Court's Individual Practices. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 12/12/2024. (ICP) |
||