Joseph Rouse v. Zam 1, Inc. et al

New York Eastern District Court
Judge:	Marcia M Henry
Case #:	1:25-cv-00176
Nature of Suit	446 Civil Rights - Amer w/Disabilities - Other
Cause	42:1201 Civil Rights (Disability)

Case Filed:

Jan 10, 2025

Docket
Parties (3)

Last checked: Monday Feb 24, 2025 3:46 AM EST

Defendant Holly Belly LLC	Represented By Diana Y. Seo Seo Law Group, PLLC contact info
Defendant Zam 1, Inc.
Plaintiff Joseph Rouse Barducci Law PLLC 5 West 19 St 10th fl New York, NY 10011	Represented By Maria Constanza Barducci Barducci Law Firm PLLC contact info

Docket last updated: 03/16/2025 11:59 PM EDT

Thursday, March 13, 2025
11		11 answer Answer to Complaint Thu 03/13 7:43 PM ANSWER to1 Complaint, by Holly Belly LLC. (Seo, Diana) Related: [-]
10		10 misc Corporate Disclosure Statement Thu 03/13 7:42 PM Corporate Disclosure Statement by Holly Belly LLC (Seo, Diana) Related: [-]
Tuesday, February 18, 2025
9		9 service Summons Returned Executed Tue 02/18 8:47 AM SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joseph Rouse. Holly Belly LLC served on 1/17/2025, answer due 2/7/2025. (Barducci, Maria) Related: [-]
Saturday, February 15, 2025
		order Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Sat 02/15 12:06 PM ORDER granting 8 : By 03/13/2025 , Defendant Holly Belly LLC shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, with Plaintiff's consent. Under the standards set forth in Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara , 10 F.3d 90, 96 (2d Cir. 1993), the Court is satisfied that Defendant Holly Belly LLC has demonstrated "good cause" as to why it should be permitted to respond to the Complaint after the deadline has elapsed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c); see also Liang v. Home Reno Concepts, LLC, 803 F. App'x 444, 446 n.2 (2d Cir. 2020). Specifically, (1) the default was not willful and (2) Plaintiff would not be prejudiced, as Plaintiff has consented to the extension. Even though Defendant does not expound upon its defenses, in light of the "oft-stated preference for resolving disputes on the merits," the motion is granted. See Enron Oil Corp. , 10 F.3d at 95. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry on 02/15/2025. (YHW) Related: [-]
		order Order(Other) Sat 02/15 12:08 PM ORDER : By 02/18/2025, Plaintiff shall file proof that the summons and Complaint were served on Defendant Holly Belly LLC. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry on 02/15/2025. (YHW) Related: [-]
Wednesday, February 12, 2025
8		8 motion Extension of Time to File Answer Wed 02/12 8:15 PM Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re1 Complaint, re: Defendant Holly Belly LLC's time to respond to the Complaint by Holly Belly LLC. (Seo, Diana) Related: [-]
		Att: 1 Supplement Stipulation and Proposed Order Extending Defendant Holly Belly LLC's Time to Respond to the Complaint
Monday, February 10, 2025
7		7 notice Notice of Appearance Mon 02/10 5:47 PM NOTICE of Appearance by Diana Y. Seo on behalf of Holly Belly LLC (aty to be noticed) (Seo, Diana) Related: [-]
Tuesday, February 04, 2025
6		6 order Scheduling Order Tue 02/04 11:29 AM SCHEDULING ORDER: An in-person initial conference will be held on 04/10/2025 at 10:00AM in Courtroom 13C South before Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry. All counsel must attend. Counsel are directed to review the attached Initial Conference Order and this Court's Individual Practice Rules for instructions. By 04/03/2025 , the parties must file a joint and completed copy of the attached Proposed Discovery Plan (also available in PDF format at: [LINK:https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/local_rules/ProposedDiscoveryPlanMMH.pdf] ). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry on 02/04/2025. (SY) Related: [-]
		Att: 1 Individual Practice Rules,
		Att: 2 Proposed Discovery Plan
Friday, January 10, 2025
5		5 service Summons Issued Fri 01/10 4:47 PM Summons Issued as to Holly Belly LLC, Zam 1, Inc.. (KD) Related: [-]
4		4 misc Quality Control Check - Attorney Case Opening Fri 01/10 4:36 PM This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) Related: [-]
3		3 notice Notice of Opportunity to Consent Fri 01/10 4:33 PM Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here:[LINK:https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program.] Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website:[LINK:https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program.] (KD) Related: [-]
2		2 misc Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet Fri 01/10 4:17 PM Proposed Summons. Re1 Complaint, by Joseph Rouse (Barducci, Maria) Related: [-]
		Att: 1 Proposed Summons Request for Issuance of Summons
1		1 20 pgs cmp Complaint Fri 01/10 4:09 PM COMPLAINT against Joseph Rouse filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-18653683 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Joseph Rouse. (Barducci, Maria) Related: [-]
		Att: 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Sheet
		utility Case Assigned/Reassigned Fri 01/10 4:31 PM Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our[LINK:website] . Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) Related: [-]

Continue to Create Account